Comment on "Censorship" ☠️

<- View Parent
dreamy@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

It’d seem that there isn’t really that much research in this area. This is the only article I could find directly related to child SA, with a helpful conclusion:

In this work, we have established how people with attractions to children are seeking sexual satisfaction using a range of different forms of FSM depicting children. We found no evidence that engaging with sexual fantasy and various forms of FSM was associated with variance in self-reported willingness to engage in sexual offences involving children, despite substantial numbers in our sample expressing a willingness to engage in these behaviours. Instead, we found that those who were more sexually satisfied reported a lower level of willingness to engage in such behaviours, while those who held offence-supportive beliefs reported a higher willingness. We urge researchers and clinicians to use our work as a springboard for further studies on the pursuit of sexual satisfaction, the addressing of sexual frustration. All of this should be conducted within the context of reducing potential risk, while encouraging a more evidence-informed social conversation about the importance of sexuality considerations in this area.

www.tandfonline.com/doi/…/19419899.2026.2619511#d…

Though I think that banning lolicon drawings would just make pedophiles go and consume actual child pornography, which is arguably worse.

source
Sort:hotnewtop