dreamy
@dreamy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Comment on Bit harsh? 5 days ago:
- Comment on "Censorship" ☠️ 1 week ago:
I kinda enjoy it too, but Rudeus is just such a piece of shit, and the writer probably is as well. I was so happy that we were getting nice, non-fetishistic Eris-focused episodes for the new season, but as of episode 3 we’re back to square one with this jackass 🤦♀️.
- Comment on "Censorship" ☠️ 1 week ago:
lmao 😭
The study I linked is self-reported inclination. I think more data can be collected that way.
- Comment on "Censorship" ☠️ 1 week ago:
This is a false equivalency. Pedophile doesn’t mean someone that rapes children. A pedophile is someone that’s sexually attracted to children. Someone that rapes children is called a child rapist. You can be a pedophile that recognizes their urges being bad and thus not act upon them/get psychological help. This is why your analogy fails.
What we know is that there is no direct implication between consuming this content and engaging in criminal activity.
I know, I’m not for banning the content either. Let it stay as the nicotine patch that it is, until evidence comes out showing that it does increase child sexual assault.
- Comment on "Censorship" ☠️ 1 week ago:
It’d seem that there isn’t really that much research in this area. This is the only article I could find directly related to child SA, with a helpful conclusion:
In this work, we have established how people with attractions to children are seeking sexual satisfaction using a range of different forms of FSM depicting children. We found no evidence that engaging with sexual fantasy and various forms of FSM was associated with variance in self-reported willingness to engage in sexual offences involving children, despite substantial numbers in our sample expressing a willingness to engage in these behaviours. Instead, we found that those who were more sexually satisfied reported a lower level of willingness to engage in such behaviours, while those who held offence-supportive beliefs reported a higher willingness. We urge researchers and clinicians to use our work as a springboard for further studies on the pursuit of sexual satisfaction, the addressing of sexual frustration. All of this should be conducted within the context of reducing potential risk, while encouraging a more evidence-informed social conversation about the importance of sexuality considerations in this area.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/…/19419899.2026.2619511#d…
Though I think that banning lolicon drawings would just make pedophiles go and consume actual child pornography, which is arguably worse.
- Comment on "Censorship" ☠️ 1 week ago:
Yeah, it is.
- Submitted 1 week ago to [deleted] | 290 comments
- Comment on holding sex 2 weeks ago:
Use xcancel.com instead of x.com, it’s a frontend that allows you to see posts without an account.
- Comment on Good offer! Which one should I pick? 2 weeks ago:
Wireguard isn’t what matters. What matters is how much personal data the VPN company collects and how they handle that personal data. In Mullvad’s case, they don’t need any personal information to sign up (you just generate an account number and can then pay via cash/monero for anonymity), and they don’t get any personal information when you use the service either as their servers are RAM-only so they can’t log anything.
- Comment on It'sa so easy 2 weeks ago:
do-a leap-a
It’s really stupid.
- Comment on Gamers Nexus disappointment :( 3 weeks ago:
No, LTT did in-video edits. They called them out because they had insane errors that could’ve been easily caught during editing in the first place, and their “fixes” were sometimes very unnoticeable by the viewer (just small text on the bottom correcting the information etc.).
