King Leopold is absolutely one of the worse humans we have ever produced.
You’re right but also extremely wrong:
Unbeknownst to most, Belgium was one of the absolute WORST colonial powers back in the day, which deserves all the condemnation in the world.
That being said, MODERN DAY Belgium isn’t doing any of that, much less the national football team.
BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Jiral@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I thought it was pretty much general knowledge that Belgium was one of the most terrible colinial powers in europe?
I do see the lack of relevance of that for that football game though. It is like talking about the genocide(s) the US was built upon, just because of a football game.
angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
People do that kind of thing all the time though.
dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Leopold the First was some random minor German nobility who was placed on the ‘throne’ iirc.
His son was one of history’s more horrific, while still utterly incompetent, monsters.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Thanks, edited the original comment 😁
elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Europe’s royal shuffling is rife with things like that. Most royal families have blood ties with each other, and historically have agreed to place one of theirs on another countries throne to keep collective hold on the continent.
“The German Kaiser (Wilhelm II), Russian Czar (Nicholas II), and English King (George V) were all first cousins. Their grandmother was England’s Queen Victoria, making the English and German kings first cousins. The English and Russian kings were also first cousins, as their mothers were sisters.”
shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
History doesn’t exist in a vacuum I’m afraid. If an entity, whether it’s a person or a nation, commits atrocities and then simply stops doing so, can we call that justice?
Colonialism may have come to an end but Belgium is still a neocolonialist nation.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Fair enough. I was about to be snarky about blaming the football team for it, so thanks for heading that fruitless discussion off at the pass 😁
zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Colonialism only took on modern forms. It’s always been might makes right.
Now with some countries slowly rising from its shadows, a lot of people in the west are pissing their pants that the tables might turn. Even if we’re a very long stretch away from that, and climate change is ironically affecting us less than the so-called global south.
shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
It may not be as long a stretch as it seems.
Climate change is in many ways an extension of neocolonialism ie. localizing benefits while externalizing harms. Western countries, despite making up 20% of the global population, are responsible for 50% of global cumulative emissions.
Back during the Earth Summit in 1992:
“In view of the different contributions to global environmental degradation, States have common but differentiated responsibilities. The developed countries acknowledge the responsibility that they bear in the international pursuit of sustainable development in view of the pressures their societies place on the global environment and of the technologies and financial resources they command.”
Based on this, the Rio declararion explicitly stated that developed countries must take the lead in combating climate change and its adverse effects.
As we all know, these responsibilities were ultimately betrayed
The world has a way of rebalancing itself. We may not see a complete rebalancing in our lifetimes but the process has already begun.
elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Colonialism has generally never played nice for the conquered, however, some, like the Romans, and to a certain extent the Moors, Ottomans, Spanish, and others were somewhat integrating, excesses and plunder non withstanding, and contributed to the conquered. Belgian Congo was pure evil.
I have Belgian blood, BTW.