Comment on This Apple Lie at the grocery store
Buckshot@programming.dev 5 hours agoThe difference is the others don’t require a tropical environment to grow. So you can grow them without any deforestation.
Comment on This Apple Lie at the grocery store
Buckshot@programming.dev 5 hours agoThe difference is the others don’t require a tropical environment to grow. So you can grow them without any deforestation.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
Where are you suggesting to find another 500 million acres of land, a tad more than the size of Alaska, without environmental impact?
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
we make them. with environmental impact because you can’t exist without it, but we do what we can to minimize it yes. We got a shitton of land out in texas that is being used as oilfields. get some environmental remediation out there first to make it suitable for farmland, use some of the grassy areas as well, and there’s a good quarter of that chunk at least.
and I’d bump that up to like 650million acres, because we’re not using prime farmland to get this oil. yields will probably be less.
but like, the room to grow this is there.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 hour ago
Ok. Texas is 170M acres. We’ve allocated Texas, that’s 30% of what we need. Which other US states can we sacrifice?
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 57 minutes ago
i don’t think missouri or mississippi would mind if we sacrificed them
Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
The obvious answer is some of the Land used to grow soybeans and corn for animal feed.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
By that logic though, imagine how much land we could reclaim for other purposes (including reforestation) if we shifted more existing farmland towards palm oil.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 hours ago
That’s not where palms grow.