Comment on Using conservative logic
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 month agoYou are purposely choosing to ignore the context in which the original statement was made, so that you can paint it as unfounded.
That’s either pure intellectual dishonesty, or an exemplary demonstration of being incapable of logical thought, either of which seems to place you squarely in the demographic being targeted in this thread.
Rustmilian@lemmy.world 1 month ago
False. I’m simply saying that it applies to more than just conservatives… That’s all. Not that it doesn’t apply to conservatives at all…
It’s literally not even a fighting statement but a simple reference to the cooked state of American political parties. It’s not that deep my friend.
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s a distinction without a difference.
If you’re looking to refute a point, then commit to it and argue properly. If you’re trying to make a different point, then state it and provide your reasoning.
You did neither.
Rustmilian@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No shit, because it’s not supposed to be serious. Just a basic “hah, it kinda works for all of them”. Jesus.
homes@piefed.world 1 month ago
Image
Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Can we at least get the wickerman?
homes@piefed.world 1 month ago
Image
Rustmilian@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m literally saying I agree with your original statement. Why do mfs always got to make a fucking fight over stupid pointless shit. God damn.
homes@piefed.world 1 month ago
That’s very clearly not what happened here
davidagain@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s possible to become extremely tired of RELENTLESS reality-defying bOtH SiDes nonsense.