Comment on Using conservative logic
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 days agoYou are purposely choosing to ignore the context in which the original statement was made, so that you can paint it as unfounded.
That’s either pure intellectual dishonesty, or an exemplary demonstration of being incapable of logical thought, either of which seems to place you squarely in the demographic being targeted in this thread.
Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 days ago
False. I’m simply saying that it applies to more than just conservatives… That’s all. Not that it doesn’t apply to conservatives at all…
It’s literally not even a fighting statement but a simple reference to the cooked state of American political parties. It’s not that deep my friend.
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 days ago
That’s a distinction without a difference.
If you’re looking to refute a point, then commit to it and argue properly. If you’re trying to make a different point, then state it and provide your reasoning.
You did neither.
Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No shit, because it’s not supposed to be serious. Just a basic “hah, it kinda works for all of them”. Jesus.
homes@piefed.world 2 days ago
Image
Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Can we at least get the wickerman?
homes@piefed.world 2 days ago
Image
Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I’m literally saying I agree with your original statement. Why do mfs always got to make a fucking fight over stupid pointless shit. God damn.
homes@piefed.world 2 days ago
That’s very clearly not what happened here
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days ago
It’s possible to become extremely tired of RELENTLESS reality-defying bOtH SiDes nonsense.