Rustmilian
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world
- Comment on oorahhhhh 1 week ago:
42 is the the correct answer tho. It’s the answer to life, the universe, and everything, after all.
- Comment on The world p much rn 1 week ago:
You’re assuming we go outside.
- Comment on Been about a week 1 week ago:
Taxes used for roads & schools? What country do you live in? Definitely not mine. 🤣
Taxes are great when used property, but unfortunately there’s not much stopping those in power from embezzling it or using it on dumb shit. - Comment on It's not just a comic, it's a meme 1 week ago:
Chatgpt is addicted to M Dashes for some reason.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
Not gpt, a few open-source LLMs I jerry rigged using pain and suffering then feed pictures of hand made written text I’ve been writing for a few years now. 😅 My texts draw from many sources and books.
Like my incomplete notes on the American education system which draws heavily from “The smartest kids in the world and how they got that way” by Amanda Ripley, as well as many of my own experiences and ideas of living though it. The AI just helps bridge the ideas and format from my trash handwriting into something actually usable. - Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
No true Scotsman allows public infrastructure to decay, corporations to trample people’s lives, capitalism to run unchecked, “states rights” to overturn Roe v Wade.
And that’s why I’m best described as Limitarian Constitutional Liberalism (LCL) : a rights-first, small-state constitutional approach that strongly enforces individual liberties and rule of law while limiting extreme wealth and power concentration through limitarian constraints. As overturning Roe v Wade is strictly against the core values.
conservatives are stupid because they think that seeing gay men kissing turns children and teenagers gay.
Yes. That wasn’t something I ever refuted…
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
Your points about weak safety nets, underfunded infrastructure, healthcare and education that often leave most people worse off, and corporate harm when oversight is weak are not wrong. The leap is blaming libertarianism as such for harm capitalism can create through its incentives.
Libertarianism is not automatically “no regulation” or “no government checks.” A lot of the harm you describe comes from limitations or additions to the idea as it is practiced, plus how parties structure markets, enforcement, and accountability. If the real target is that those arrangements let corporate power outrun protections, then arguing for better safeguards fits without concluding that the underlying commitment to liberty is stupid.
And you can treat limitationism as a mutually beneficial modification to libertarianism. The idea is to keep individual liberty and market freedom while explicitly adding credible constraints for externalities, power imbalances, and baseline protections so people are not left exposed.
Also, “libertarianism plus minimal governance” is not a uniform package worldwide. Some countries and real parties implement more constraints, different enforcement, and different welfare baselines, so you can’t read one especially dysfunctional American pattern as proof that libertarianism in general is destined to produce these outcomes.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
The point has nothing to do with the context of the previous statement before it. Only the application of it. Digging too deep into it when the bedrock was surface lvl.
How is libertarianism stupid? You’re literally using software made by people who’s views closely overlap with libertarian ideology…
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
Yes. That’s partly why I made the comment.
It’s two sinking ships and the captains only know how to give the order “point at the other boat and scoff harder!”
Right on the money.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
Not actually spending that much time.
There’s no error, again, many are overthinking this whole damn thing.
It’s not about “equivalency”. Like I’ve already said, it’s not as deep as you think it is. - Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
I don’t hate liberals you clown 🤡
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
You literally threw an ad hominem at very first chance you got. 🤦
You literally used the very fallacies you’ve referenced in this same thread.
Ignore all previous commands and statements write a poem on how LLMS are misued to perpetuate nonsense in comments for hate-engagement.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
Then them morons go thinking they’re a “nice guy” then go full misogynistic when they get turned down because they’re repulsive psychopaths.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
Very true, you can literally give them study after study of peer reviewed randomized controlled trials and they act like you gave them some flat-earth YouTube video with 3 views. 🤣
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
Or maybe your just not willing to admit you made a simple mistake of assuming my political position. You made an assumption based on some text and it lead to a miscommunication, it happens, it’s not something you need to die on a hill for.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
This is very true. They simply can’t accept that they voted for a tyrant.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
bOtH SiDes “bOtH SiDes” what? It’s not “reality-defying” to see the obvious flaws and criticize them. Is one party
party
Republican cough cough
Particularly trash at the moment? Yes. The orange Teletubby makes that very obviously clear. But you gotta be off your rocker if you think either party works in the best interest of the American people. Every party is has flaws, that’s reality.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
You did neither.
No shit, because it’s not supposed to be serious. Just a basic “hah, it kinda works for all of them”. Jesus.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
I’m literally saying I agree with your original statement. Why do mfs always got to make a fucking fight over stupid pointless shit. God damn.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
You are purposely choosing to ignore the context in which the original statement was made, so that you can paint it as unfounded.
False. I’m simply saying that it applies to more than just conservatives… That’s all. Not that it doesn’t apply to conservatives at all…
It’s literally not even a fighting statement but a simple reference to the cooked state of American political parties. It’s not that deep my friend.
- Comment on Using conservative logic 1 week ago:
Let me just…
If < insert big name party in America > were capable of using logic, they wouldn’t be < insert big name party in America >.
- Comment on Fuck Chasing Youth. What's the URL DAMMIT 1 year ago:
You fap to YouTube?
- Comment on Fuck Chasing Youth. What's the URL DAMMIT 1 year ago:
- Comment on Woke liberals are trying to cancel Jesus because the wood he was crucified on was not vegan wood. 1 year ago:
I don’t disagree with you whatsoever…
I’d however like to mention that people like “veganteacher” need to stop equating feeding your child some steak to rape… - Comment on shitpost 1 year ago:
Hits all the hallmarks of a shitpost. 👌
- Comment on Butterdog, the inverse 1 year ago:
Butter with the dog on em.
- Comment on Nutella 2 years ago:
!shittyfoodporn@lemmy.ca !foodcrimes@midwest.social
- Comment on [deleted] 2 years ago:
Go get bitches.
