I’m impressed you made it half way, the man was not a natural writer by any means.
Comment on *Honk honk*
halvar@lemy.lol 3 days ago
I don’t know… I’ve always found Kaczinsky an interesting guy, but now that I’m around halfway through his book, I find his arguements surprisingly weak as in he doesn’t really put a lot of effort into justifying the basics. He just goes on to say “yeah obfuscating the process of survival is bad” and sure I can see how some people might find hunting rabbits with bows more fulfilling than looking at Excel all day but if you don’t accept that immediately then his arguements become pretty weak.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
ZMoney@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I use Excel to calculate the ages of the oldest rocks in the Solar System. If I was using it to find accounting loopholes for a private equity firm, I’d probably kill myself.
Ted’s problem is that he equates the tools and the processes of post-industrial society with its people. Just because the possibility exists for these surrogate activities to replace meaningful work doesn’t mean we all succumb automatically.
lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Ted’s problem was that he murdered people.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Ted’s problem was that he murdered the wrong people. Let’s be completely honest if he was killing politicians and their corporate masters he would be a hell of a lot less controversial. So long as fascists, authoritarians, and their weak willed followers exist there is no excuse to kill the innocent, collateral not withstanding if someone took out a small town to kill Musk it’d be acceptable for example.
lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m a Gandhi and King fan so I wholeheartedly disagree.
halvar@lemy.lol 2 days ago
“Equating the tools and processes with the people” is such a good way of putting it that I gotta remember to remember it.