Comment on Fallout: New Vegas dev says don't expect a remaster, argues Bethesda doesn't have the source code or 'the engineering knowhow'

A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

• BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  with the cut content restored and an actually fleshed out legion

  source

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    and less loading screens, especially around new vegas, because they had to cater to the ram limits of the consoles at the time.

    source

    • BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      going to the top of the lucky 38 and seeing absolutely nothing out the window was such a huge disappointment

      i figured since fo3 had the washington monument then surely new vegas would have a similar one

      source

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        the best thing about a remake for either Fallout 3 or New Vegas, it’d do a significant chunk of the work for remaking the other one.

        So having them bundled into one remake bundle would be fantastic.

        Probaly never happen, but a boy can dream.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• graynk@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’m of a firm opinion that no game needs a remake. Fixing up old games so that they can be played on modern systems - yes please. Remaking the same game but “”“better”“” - no thanks, I’d rather see something original and new come out

  There are some exceptions like Pathologic 2 which is basically a remake but also a reimagining, but those are exceedingly rare.

  source

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I’ll disagree a bit. Angel of Darkness should definitely have been a Remake.

    They must have put so much effort in to get that just as crappy as the original.

    source
• sturmblast@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Sequql…

  source