And the space shuttle which did it for decades
Comment on Wake up sheeple
quips@slrpnk.net 14 hours agoIncluding the soyuz which to this day routinely lands on land
rumba@lemmy.zip 12 hours ago
Comment on Wake up sheeple
quips@slrpnk.net 14 hours agoIncluding the soyuz which to this day routinely lands on land
And the space shuttle which did it for decades
Spezi@feddit.org 13 hours ago
But the landing needs active thrusters to soften the blow. This introduces more complexity and also adds more danger as there needs to be extra fuel on board.
j5y7@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
And extra weight I imagine, making it more expensive to launch.
Pacattack57@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Correct. It’s not that they can’t, they save tens of millions by landing in the water on fuel alone. Not only to land but to leave. The extra fuel increases the weight which increases the overall fuel cost on launch.