It’s the argument style, and the “it’s not X, it’s Y” conclusion. Very common in LLM speak. Doesn’t mean it is, though
Comment on We fought to free the nipple… and all we got was a better kind of thirst trap.
dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Look, I’m not here to shame sex work, but lets be real. The entire business model for these women is based on their bodies being as sexualized as possible. They aren’t trying to dismantle the system of objectification; they’re trying to become CEO of it. For them, #FreeTheNipple isn’t a protest, it’s an ad. It’s a free sample to lure customers back to their subscription page. They’re using the language of social justice to funnel political sympathy into their bank accounts. It’s brilliant, in a completely cynical way. They didn’t free the nipple, they just put a new price tag on it and called it liberation.
this feels like it was written by LLM
_g_be@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Magnum@infosec.pub 16 hours ago
Because it was. The whole article structure smells like a LLM
Epzillon@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Yeah, look at the headings, terribly obvious IMO. Theres also just something weird with the article content wise. Like, why are we blaming the women again? Because they do sex work? And that is not a fault of the system? Idk, this smells really bad…
Truth be told i stopped reading after just glancing the headings but it feels real bad.
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 hours ago
It’s glaringly obvious
sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 hours ago
Actually and literally fucking preemptively excusing and justifying what they say. SWERF shit