But collateral isn’t used as part of a transaction unless the loan is defaulted on.
Comment on How would you actually tax the ultra wealthy?
Dagamant@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The biggest loophole they use is taking out loans and using stock as collateral. Stock is supposed to be unrealized so if it is used as part of ANY transaction it should instantly become taxable.
damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I’ve heard this before but don’t understand how it works… Eventually they’ll need to pay it off, no? So they sell stocks to pay the loan?
TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
yeah, but by the time you have to pay it back your stock has accrued more value, so you just take out another loan.
whoxtank28@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Its a buy borrow die strategy. You take loans and refi them to be larger and larger until you die, when you do, the cost basis is reset (so if your cost basis was 1,000,000, but you investments are now worth 20,000,000, your cost basis becomes an untaxable 20,000,000) this new “stepped up” untaxable money (in investments) is used to pay off the debt by selling some assets, lets say 5,000,000 in debt covered by selling (untaxable) investments. This would be for someone with a handful of millions of dollars, I can only imagine what it is like for someone who has hundreds of billions in assets…
AA5B@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Pay it off over time with lower taxes income.
If I earn $1M I have to pay a lot of income tax. But if I take a loan for $1M, I may only need to earn a taxable income of $100K
Trex202@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Then every 5 years or so, force everyone to “realize” their stock value for taxation
howrar@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I feel like that just overcomplicates things. As long as they can’t use the money, they’re not causing harm, right?
If you want a more continuous stream of income, a wealth tax would make more sense.
Trex202@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
But they are using the money. It’s invested, it’s supporting a profitable cause, driving an agenda