Right. So, generating training data :-)
Comment on Block ditches 4,000 staff, because AI can do their jobs
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day agoFinancial services, so probably transcribing people’s shitty scribbled expense reports into actually usable structured data, and doing it flawlessly enough they don’t get sued.
deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 day ago
Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 1 day ago
Can we start placing bets on when we find out that the “AI tools” they’re using are just sweat shop workers in Bangladesh processing invoices?
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Eh, I know this is the anti-AI instance, but reading and interpreting things like that is something you can verifiably get AI to do 90% of the time.
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 23 hours ago
Because 90% accuracy is acceptable for financial institutions …
XLE@piefed.social 22 hours ago
I’ve got an idea. If 90% of AI’s output is accurate, just have humans review the 10% that will be inaccurate.
(Yes I am an AI expert, how did you know)
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 23 hours ago
No, it’s really not. Thus the 6000 remaining employees.
(Assuming this is a significant part of their business)
scintilla@crust.piefed.social 23 hours ago
Hell USPS has been using machine learning (yes a kind of AI but not the kind they are implying) for years to do that kind of thing.
Paradox@lemdro.id 21 hours ago
Kind of
They’ve had several address resolution centers around the country, where reviewers look at mail and figure out it’s address. They don’t physically handle the mail, it’s an image on a screen.
Iirc they’ve been doing it this way since the 70s