Ok, so it wasn’t even an added detail. It was changing the topic to present day instead of the past.
Comment on it's true
m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 day ago“was” vs. “is”
cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Legianus@programming.dev 1 day ago
Being pedantic it is added detail. As native Americans did it, even if they still do it, they could have originally/historically not done so.
And also are there tribes/larger groups of native americans that did stop doing it? Then that statement is even stronger
TheFogan@programming.dev 1 day ago
As Mitch Hedberg would say
They used to use it
they still do.
But they used to, too!