Comment on it's true

cheesybuddha@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• m0darn@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  “was” vs. “is”

  source

  • TheFogan@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    As Mitch Hedberg would say

    They used to use it

    they still do.

    But they used to, too!

    source
  • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Ok, so it wasn’t even an added detail. It was changing the topic to present day instead of the past.

    source
  • Legianus@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Being pedantic it is added detail. As native Americans did it, even if they still do it, they could have originally/historically not done so.

    And also are there tribes/larger groups of native americans that did stop doing it? Then that statement is even stronger

    source
• wieson@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  It specifies the cultural application but broadens the temporal.

  (To be more direct: not every first nation practiced that technique.)

  source

  • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    And thus is not a correction. It’s an added detail at best, or at least a change of topic. It’s not a corretion

    source

    • Jtotheb@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Changing the past tense to present tense (these people and practices are still very real, they are not just part of “the past”) is a correction.

      source

      • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        No it is not.

        One person is talking about the past. The other person is talking about the present

        source

        • -> View More Comments