Comment on Anti-Trans Groups Want a Bathroom Ban. Judges Aren’t Giving Them One

Mongostein@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Not a fan of putting up more surveillance in general, even less so in public toilets. Also what happens to the urinals in this scenario?

  source

  • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    You either have a completely different section or just get rid of them altogether

    source
  • Denjin@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Urinals are purely there to increase throughput and reduce cleaning time. Just get rid.

    source

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Increasing throughput and reducing cleaning time are both good things, though.

      Increased throughput means less queuing and being able to quickly relieve yourself. In a shared toilet, this would benefit men and women alike.

      Making cleaning quicker and easier means it’ll happen more and be less disruptive when it does happen.

      source

      • Denjin@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        But if you want to make true ungendered toilets (as was suggested) that are accessible to all, having a section where a bunch of guys all basically get their cocks out and piss in a trough kinda prevents that.

        source

        • -> View More Comments