Comment on Anon thinks we're being bamboo-zled
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 20 hours agomost of the citations are improper/broken
…citations… to books… not broken links lol.
[19] (tr. adapted from Harper 2013: 185, 205)
And on page 185, we find the exact text cited
finitebanjo@piefed.world 19 hours ago
The wikipedia contributors were unable to link to a digitization of the book, that's what I mean by improper. I don't own a copy of books written in 223 AD, neither does my local library.
The Donald Harper book you just posted was published in 2012.
mech@feddit.org 19 hours ago
I’m following this exchange with steadily increasing fascination, still on the fence on whether Pandas exist.
Icytrees@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
I found a lead. Could help explain why pandas got so famous in China so recently. Taipei Times isn’t a great source but it’s late and I got excited. www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/…/2003435562
idiomaddict@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Say your library did, you would read this book in Classical Chinese? Or would you rely on a translation, probably published much later?
finitebanjo@piefed.world 17 hours ago
It being listed in the catalog would at least be some indication that the evidence exists, as opposed to an endless linked list of "trust me bro".
idiomaddict@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Here’s a digitization of the first one and the second one, including a picture of an edition of the work itself. I found it by googling the names of the works in the quoted section.
If that’s not sufficient, I suggest you ask at your local (or most local) university library.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
That’s not how citations work.
TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Here’s a link to the Erya.