Comment

PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

I did the research, and I concur.

ISO3533

Sex toys — Design and safety requirements for products in direct contact with genitalia, the anus, or both

5.2.1.1

5.2.1.1 Anal use products A sex toy shall have sufficient mechanisms and design features to prevent them from being inserted further than intended to prevent retention in the anus or rectum during its intended use. The effectiveness of these design features shall be tested and documented. The flexibility of the product and the base-to-neck ratio should be considered. EXAMPLE 1 Anal plugs, anal beads, anal dildos. Medium and large products shall have design features making it possible for medical professionals to extract if retained, by using tools and instruments commonly used for medical procedures. See Table B.2. EXAMPLE 2 Loops, strings, or accessible edges.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Skullgrid@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3533

The discussion resulted in 2021 in a first release of the norm, as ISO 3533:2021.

What the fuck, it took till 2021 for the first standard to be made?!

source
- riskable@programming.dev ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  It took until 2021 but we can finally say, “we live in a society.”
  
  Because we have standards.
  
  source
  - Skullgrid@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    
    can finally say, “we live in a society.”
    
    bottom standards
    
    source
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
But what if they’re from wish.com and full of harmful chemicals?

source
- AnyOldName3@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  In a lot of the world they’re regulated as novelty items, so free from the regulation that stops harmful chemicals being in things like kitchen utensils and childrens’ toys, despite many of the same potential risks being present. You don’t need to use a corner-cutting regulation-ignoring retailer like Wish to get your fix of toxic plasticisers etc…
  
  source
DmMacniel@feddit.org ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
oh my

source