I’m not trying to grade on potential but betting on human potential vs AI potential feels like it rewards ourselves for being better vs a machine. Would we have Albert Einstein if we didn’t have Isaac Newton?
Comment on Might not be efficient, but at least it... Uhhh, wait, what good does it provide again?
the_q@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
To be fair a lot of people think they’re intelligent and they really really aren’t.
Aneb@lemmy.world 1 day ago
applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
That’s kind of a false dichotomy. They may be separate today, but there’s no reason to believe we won’t augment human minds with artificial neural networks in the future. Not in the magical cure all fix all way techbros like to sell it, but for like really boring and mundane things initially. Think replacing a small damaged part of some brain region, like the visual or auditory cortexes, to repair functional deficiencies. Once they get the basic technology worked out to be reliable, repeatable, and not require too much maintenance (cough subscriptions and software licenses), there’s no reason to believe we won’t progress rapidly to other augmentations and improvements. A simple graphical interface for like a heads up display or a simple audio interface for direct communications both come to mind, but I’m sure our imaginations will be comically optimistic about some things and comically pessimistic about others. All that to say that any true AI potential will be human potential in time. We won’t stop at making super intelligent AGI. We will want to BE super intelligent AGI. Since we already know highly efficient and capable intelligence is possible (see yourself) it’s only a matter of time until we make it ourselves, provided we don’t kill ourselves somehow along the way.
fartographer@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Why do people keep telling me this?
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
And then the LLMs get trained on those idiots.
Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Especially if they’ve had cocaine.