Sure, but let’s assume you want to eat x grams of animal products a week. You could either buy them and eat them, or buy them, have them expire, and then you have to re-buy them. The second one clearly sucks more.
Comment on The moment we've all been waiting for: you now can have targeted ads on your 2k smartfridge
UndergroundGoblin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours agoIf it’s dead, it’s dead. Whether you eat it or not, it won’t change anything. The purchase kills the animal, not the consumption.
LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
UndergroundGoblin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
Sure, that would indeed be a shame. But nobody is dependent on animal products unless there’s a medical reason.
LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 7 hours ago
Fair point, and I am not going to argue that. I am just pointing out that eating animal products you have already bought is the less bad option compared to not eating them.
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
“Have you heard of our lord and savior, veganism?”
Yes, leave me alone.
Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 hours ago
Nobody is obligated to inject vegan philosophy into every irrelevant discussion unless they have a mental disorder.
LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 7 hours ago
As a non-vegan, what the fuck, mate? There are ways to disagree without essentially calling people insane.
hans@feddit.org 5 hours ago
i think most people would disagree
sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org 4 hours ago
hm. Id see it differently. kill animal -> eat animal 👌
kill animal -> let its body rot in the refrigerator while my hungover ass orders thai food is the closest I get to calling something a sin. its a crime against ecology imo.
I get what youre saying though, I just definitely see it through a different lens
hans@feddit.org 5 hours ago
the animal is usually dead before someone walks into the grocery store