Comment

Comment on Yea well it still can't have an existential crisis like humans can! Take that!

When was the last time you tried? GPT5 thinking is able to create 500 lines of code without a single error, repeatable, and add new features into it seamlessly too. Hours of work with older LLMs reduced to minutes, I really like how much it enables me to do with my limited spare time. Same with “actual” engineering, the numbers were all correct the last few times. So things it had to find a way to calculate and then figure out some assumptions and then do the math! Sometimes it gets the context wrong and since it pretty much never asks questions back, the result was absurd for me, but somewhat correct for a different context. Really good stuff.

source

Sort:hotnew top

BroBot9000@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Really good until you stop double checking it and it makes shit up. 🤦‍♂️

Go take your Ai apologist bullshit and feed it to the corporate simps.

source
- Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  The good thing is that in code, if it makes shit up it simply does not work the way it is supposed to.
  
  You can keep your hatred to yourself, let alone the bullshit you make up.
  
  source
  - AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Until it leaves a security issue that isn’t immediately visible and your users get pwned.
    
    Funny that you say “bullshit you make up”, when all LLMs do is hallucinate and sometimes, by coincidence, have a “correct” result.
    
    source
    Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Calculations with bugs do not magically produce correct results and plot them correctly. Neither can such simple code change values that were read from a file or device. Etc.
    
    I do not care what you program and how bugs can sneak in there. I use it for data analysis, simulations etc. with exactly zero security implications or generally interactions with anything outside the computer.
    
    The hostility here against anyone using LLMs/AI is absurd.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
    onslaught545@lemmy.zip ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    No one ever said push it to production without a code review.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
Donkter@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
I’ve come to realize that these crazed anti-ai people are just a product of history repeating itself. They would be the same leftists who were “anti-gmo”. When you dig into it you understand that they’re against Monsanto, which is cool and good, but the whole thing is so conflated in their heads that you can’t discuss the merits of GMOs whatsoever even though they’re purportedly progressive.

It’s a pattern, their heads in the right place for the most part. But the logic is just going a little haywire as they buy into hysteria. It’ll take a few years probably as the generations cycle.

source
- Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Perhaps, yes.
  
  source
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Also did you adequately describe your problem? Treat it like a human who knows how to program, but has no idea what the fuck you’re talking about. Just like a human you have to sit it down and talk to it before you have it write code.

source
lectricleopard@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
It gave you the wrong answer. One you called absurd. And then you said “Really good stuff.”

Not to get all dead internet, but are you an LLM?

I dont understand how people think this is going to change the world. Its like the c suite folks think they can fire 90% of their company and just feed their half baked ideas for making super hero sequels into an AI and sell us tickets to the poop that falls out, 15 fingers and all.

source
- Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  So you physically read what I said and then just went with “my bias against LLMs was proven” and wrote this reply? At no point did you actually try to understand what I said? Sorry but are you an LLM?
  
  But seriously. If you ask someone on the phone “is it raining” and the person says “not now but it did a moment ago”, do you think the person is a fucking idiot because obviously the sun has been and still is shining? Or perhaps the context is different (a different location)? Do you understand that now?
  
  source
  - lectricleopard@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    You seem upset by my comment, which i dont understand at all. Im sorry if I’ve offended you. I don’t have a bias against LLMs. They’re good at talking. Very convincing. I dont need help creating text to communicate with people, though.
    
    Since you mention that this is helping you in your free time, then you might not be aware how much less useful it is in a commercial setting for coding.
    
    I’ll also note, since you mentioned it in your initial comment, LLMs dont think. They can’t think. They never will think. Thats not what these things are designed to do, and there is no means by which they might start to think if they are just bigger or faster. Talking about AI systems like they are people makes them appear more capable than they are to those that dont understand how they work.
    
    source
    Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago
    Can you define “thinking”? This is such a broad statement with so many implications. We have no idea how our brain functions.
    
    I do not use this tool for talking. I use it for data analysis, simulations, MCU programming, … Instead of having to write all of that code myself, it only takes 5 minutes now.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Maybe use an LLM to improve your grammar. Sheesh. You’re an idiot.
  
  source