Comment on Kindergarten forced to back down after proposing to charge parents $2,200 for their own children’s art

null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

Before everyone piles on, it’s probably worth understanding the context.

Yes, this was a daft idea, doomed to generate outrage, and outrage is an appropriate response.

However, as the article says, this non-profit was insolvent. This type of non-profit is not flying a CEO around in a private jet. Their entire budget for the year was $400k. Enough for rent, several staff, snacks and art supplies for kids.

The budget was very likely prepared by a volunteer, with limited skills and experience.

It’s often also unclear what an organisation’s total debts are. It’s not at all uncommon to realise an error has been made in understanding an award or something and suddenly the centre owes 5 years back pay for underpaid over time or some such.

Suddenly the centre is insolvent and is required by law to cease it’s activities.

At this point someone has had the misguided notion that the problem can be fixed by coercing parents to contribute towards the debts.

Explaining the problem to parents and asking for donations would’ve been fine, but obviously they wouldn’t have received $40k in donations so it would’ve been unsuccessful.

Tying the request to the kids “art” is just poor taste all the way up and down.

So yeah, it’s offensive, but it’s not nefarious, and while it’s really daft I can at least understand how it happened.

source
Sort:hotnewtop