Analog slop is still slop.
Comment on Utter bullshit like this
Chozo@fedia.io 1 month agoThis word is losing meaning the more it's used for things that aren't even AI.
Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Chozo@fedia.io 1 month ago
Rude thing to say about something somebody took the time and made, IMO. Especially considering that there's literally nothing wrong with the images we're even talking about. The pictures are just fine.
3abas@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You knew, sometimes the most skilled artists can still produce shit, and you’re entitled to not enjoy every piece regardless of its technical quality.
Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m not talking about the OP image, I’m talking about boardroom driven, focus tested “entertainment products” that have about as much in common as “food products” do with nutrition.
Chozo@fedia.io 1 month ago
And thus, the word "slop" begins losing meaning.
4am@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
This different between AI and Photoshop is that Photoshop takes time and skill; you need creativity.
Chozo@fedia.io 1 month ago
Sure. But this doesn't look like AI in the first place. It looks more like a Maya render, if anything.
entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
Slop as a slang term is far older than its present use to primarily describe the output of AI, see Merriam Webster’s definition 4-C for the second noun meaning of the word:
a product of little or no value : rubbish
Chozo@fedia.io 1 month ago
Right, but the current colloquial usage of the word, especially in the context of digitally-manipulated images, is AI-centered. People aren't using the word "slop" to describe bad photoshops, they're using it to describe bad AI-gen.
RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 month ago
Words can be used in multiple different, concurrent ways.