> Superman doesn’t have politics in the sense I’m talking about.
>He’s just on the side of freedom, peace, and good.
Damn, you a dense one huh
Comment on Teddybears - Punkrocker
Tedesche@lemmy.world 17 hours agoNo, you don’t understand my point, because you think I’m talking about Superman’s “politics.” I’m talking about James Gunn’s politics and him using Superman as a mouthpiece for them. Superman doesn’t have politics in the sense I’m talking about. He’s just on the side of freedom, peace, and good. Classic moral tropes that virtually everyone supports, because without context, they’re just ideals. When you contextualize them with modern, real-world events though, they become political messaging, and that’s what I don’t like in a superhero movie.
> Superman doesn’t have politics in the sense I’m talking about.
>He’s just on the side of freedom, peace, and good.
Damn, you a dense one huh
No, they’re saying the specific choices Gunn made with the story is politicizing it. Making it a direct, near 1-1 allegory with two major conflicts in the world right now is a touch on the nose.
… but that said, it’s still a stupid position to hold. There is a lot of bad crap going on in the world. Chances are, most scripts with Superman doing his thing would have some association to current events, since it’s set in a world close to “now” IRL.
Wanting entertainment to be devoid of modern politics yet set in current time is just silly. It takes drastically different settings to make it easy to have both a compelling story with conflict and devoid of modern politics.
No, actually, I think you just proved you’re the dense one.
“No, you are!” - You, that’s what you sound like.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Image
Tedesche@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
I can see you’re running out of juice, so I won’t press you further. Have a good night.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Answer the fucking question.
Tedesche@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Nah, I don’t pander to pissants.