Exactly.
Comment on [deleted]
Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoThey should learn about Christianity and Islam in their history textbooks. That’s fucking it.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Comment on [deleted]
Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoThey should learn about Christianity and Islam in their history textbooks. That’s fucking it.
Exactly.
AA5B@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Why should that be it? Throw in Deism to understand the attitude of the US founders, then round out most of the population with Islam, Hindu, Jainism, and probably many more. You have to cover Judaism because of its influence on Christianity. And of course agnostics and atheism to round out the beliefs. You’ll never hit all the possibilities but perhaps it would be ok to cover families of beliefs, such as if native belief systems are similar (I have no idea and that’s a shame)
Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I meant that’s the only place it should be learned about, and not plastered on the wall. I’d gladly shove all the other fairy tales in there too
entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
Actual inter-religious comparative theology is probably even better for developing skeptical critical thinkers than not teaching people about religion at all. I would love to see schools adopt that sort of coursework.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
We’ve had a marked drop in literacy and math skills in the last decade. We need to shore up those core skills before adding in any kind of social comparisons. The lack of understanding of nuance and context in text has directly led us to where we are in this country.