Comment on New idea

• Genius@lemmy.zip ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  In what context? Animals? Are you saying a guy sticking his dick in his pet dog is a situation without any consent problems?

  source

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Is “sticking your dick in a pet dog” the same as artificially inseminating livestock? No, it’s obviously not even close to the same thing? Then, obviously, no.

    source

    • Genius@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      It’s a foreign object in the vagina used to inject semen. It’s exactly the same. An artificial insemination device is an artificial penis. It’s designed to do what a penis does.

      source

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        You really think you’re going to win an argument by attempting to claim that fucking a dog is “exactly the same” as what dairy farmers do when they artificially inseminate cattle? False equivalency. What’s it mean when your beliefs depend on fallacies? 🤔

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  The concept of consent does not apply for livestock in this context.

  The concept of human rights does not apply for when I shove a boot up your ass after you’re done licking the dairy industry’s.

  source

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Nope, it still applies because I’m a human.

    source
• blackris@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  So you are saying rape doesn’t exist in a slavery context.

  source

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    No, slavery does not apply to livestock.

    source

    • Genius@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Are you a troll? Are you giving bad carnist arguments on purpose to help the vegan cause?

      Great job!

      source

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        No, I’m just correct.

        source

        • -> View More Comments