So you are saying rape doesn’t exist in a slavery context.
Comment on New idea
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month agoSo putting semen up a vagina
without consentisn’t rape?
The concept of consent does not apply for livestock. And yes, in the context of artificially inseminating livestock, that is correct.
blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No, slavery does not apply to livestock.
Genius@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Are you a troll? Are you giving bad carnist arguments on purpose to help the vegan cause?
Great job!
Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
They’re 100%
Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Farm animals are slaves.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
no they are not
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
The concept of consent does not apply for livestock in this context.
The concept of human rights does not apply for when I shove a boot up your ass after you’re done licking the dairy industry’s.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Nope, it still applies because I’m a human.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Not so in various parts of the world, which goes to show that humans play fast and loose with rights and morality.
You wanting to uphold those values anyway tells me that you wish for all humans to be treated the same: with dignity and respect. That same belief underpins my desire for animals to have the same, despite many places in the world completely foregoing their rights.
It’s a shame that your anthropocentrism doesn’t afford empathy for non-human animals
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So… I guess you’re done trying to argue your position after running into multiple fantasies, we’ve moved past the threats and name calling (sorta lol), and we’re onto the signaling-false-moral-superiority stage. Cool
Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Disgusting comment, it doesn’t stop being rape because the species are different.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
it’s a veterinary procedure
Genius@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
In what context? Animals? Are you saying a guy sticking his dick in his pet dog is a situation without any consent problems?
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Is “sticking your dick in a pet dog” the same as artificially inseminating livestock? No, it’s obviously not even close to the same thing? Then, obviously, no.
Genius@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
It’s a foreign object in the vagina used to inject semen. It’s exactly the same. An artificial insemination device is an artificial penis. It’s designed to do what a penis does.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You really think you’re going to win an argument by attempting to claim that fucking a dog is “exactly the same” as what dairy farmers do when they artificially inseminate cattle? False equivalency. What’s it mean when your beliefs depend on fallacies? 🤔