Comment on New idea

• theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  So putting semen up a vagina without consent isn’t rape?

  The concept of consent does not apply for livestock. And yes, in the context of artificially inseminating livestock, that is correct.

  source

  • Genius@lemmy.zip ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    In what context? Animals? Are you saying a guy sticking his dick in his pet dog is a situation without any consent problems?

    source

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Is “sticking your dick in a pet dog” the same as artificially inseminating livestock? No, it’s obviously not even close to the same thing? Then, obviously, no.

      source

      • Genius@lemmy.zip ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        It’s a foreign object in the vagina used to inject semen. It’s exactly the same. An artificial insemination device is an artificial penis. It’s designed to do what a penis does.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • blackris@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    So you are saying rape doesn’t exist in a slavery context.

    source

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      No, slavery does not apply to livestock.

      source

      • Genius@lemmy.zip ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Are you a troll? Are you giving bad carnist arguments on purpose to help the vegan cause?

        Great job!

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The concept of consent does not apply for livestock in this context.

    The concept of human rights does not apply for when I shove a boot up your ass after you’re done licking the dairy industry’s.

    source

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Nope, it still applies because I’m a human.

      source