Gandhi was a piece of shit. I wouldn’t quote him for the most part.
Comment on Anon breaks up
Olap@lemmy.world 1 day agoI have no weapon but nonviolence.
- Mahatma Gandhi
See, I can quote things too
JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
TheBat@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Hmm whom to believe, MLK or some random lemming?
JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
It seems MLK was exhausted by how ineffective peaceful protest throughout his campaigning, and communicated his doubts of whether peaceful means would actually work in his letter from Birmingham Jail. He stuck with peaceful means till he was assassinated, which is commendable.
After King’s death, the violent Holy Week Uprising occurred in response. At the end of that week, the Civil Rights Act had been passed. It sure seems like the Holy Week Uprising got some of what it wanted much faster than King’s years of peaceful protest. What King absolutely brought about, though, was a strong alignment for members of the Civil rights movement, which made the Uprising possible in the first place.
TheBat@lemmy.world 1 day ago
the US government props him up as a savior to try preventing anyone from thinking about violent means of resistance as a viable option. Same with Gandhi,
Go ahead and tell me more about my country.
TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
OW SHIT! GODDAMNIT! god fucking damnit! Piece of shit!.. Fuck!
-my neighbor the other day
Saleh@feddit.org 1 day ago
You say people should just give up their weapons. I used to be strictly against private weapon ownership too. Over the years, especially the last few years i see more and more of a necessity for people to be able to fight back against an overreaching government, as we have seen more and more authoritarian developments all across the “Western” nations.
This is what Marx referred to.
There is a political case for private weapon ownership. The obvious counter-argument is that people like MAGA also have weapons then and can use them. As we have seen with previous and current dictatorships, when push comes to shove the regime will quickly supply its paramilitary wings with guns, so i don’t see the benefit of preventing normal people from owning weapons in such a situation.
None of this is a judgement on the green-text, as we lack the whole picture, on whether taking the weapons from anon was justified or not. However the default assertion that people should just give up their weapons is not as obvious as you make it out to be.
glimse@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Gun ownership isn’t the problem. Gun culture is the problem.
I’ve been the victim of more than one violent crime but it’s only been recently that I’m considering acquiring a firearm. For the exact reasons you’re describing.