Yea but LCDs were shit and had shifting colors across the screen even when you were sitting right in front of them.
Comment on Anon takes shots at Donkey Kong
FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days agoI mean, other types of displays definitely existed.
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 days ago
cubism_pitta@lemmy.world 3 days ago
In that era you had CRTs or Rear Projection TVs.
Rear Projection was bigger (55" 4:3) but often times was susceptible to burn-in and had a worse quality picture compared to a CRT
Before LCDs it was plasma which until the the late 2000s which had the most technical advantages over LCD Refresh rate, contrast. LCDs couldn’t really match them until the 2010s (I never had a plasma display though so I don’t fully understand plasma)
DLP was a thing and could get up to and over 80" while maintaining quality but DLP could not be wall mounted as they were quite big like rear projection screens
lka1988@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
glances at 1080p Sharp Aquos TV from 2007 currently in living room
cubism_pitta@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Bad viewing angles, poor contrast ratios, poor refresh rate and poor display speed.
I was not saying that they were non existent or unreliable. The technology was just poor at that time and beaten by Plasma displays in those areas
Plasma displays had 2 problems though (besides cost) They were heavier than LCDs and their backlights would dim over time.
lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
I still have the plasma TV in my house my dad bought in 2007. The backlight is a little dim but not too much, and there is no significant screen burn-in to my knowledge.
It’s great for mid-late 2000’s consoles and TV shows.
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Plasmas dont have backlights, they worked similar to oled.
a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
and don’t forget to tell the movers to keep it upright while transporting it to prevent damage lol
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Rear projections are 3 crts in a trench coat.