Fun fact: The german word for using a radio is “funken”; literally “to spark”. A radioman is, or was, a “Funker”. When you are talking over the radio, you are doing it “Über Funk”.
Comment on Hertz, showing the difference between science and engineering
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
I mean, it would be some 25 years until the radio was invented. And Hertz’ machine required a 30kV spark on a 2.5m meter long antenna with 2 solid 30cm zinc spheres, and his transmission range was something like “barely down the hall”.
Not the most practical method.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 days ago
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
ooh i always guessed the word “Funk” comes from function, i.e. the radio is a useful tool that has a function to whoever is using it.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It really is from “Funkentechnik”: “Spark technology”. I wonder how many people appreciate the post for the cute etymology and how many because it sounds funny.
Good information for ham radio people, too. Hobby sounds too geeky? Just say you’re into Über-Funk-Parties.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Appreciate for both of course!
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
ok but now, where does the word “Funke” (spark) come from?
squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Pretty much the first type of commercially viable radio transmitter was the spark-gap transmitter (“Knallfunkensender” in German). It worked by charging up some capacitors to up to 100kV and then letting them spark. This spark sent a massive banging noise on the whole radio spectrum, which could then be turned into an audible noise using a very simple receiver. That was then used to send morse codes (or similar encodings).
They went into service around 1900, and by 1920 it was illegal to use these because they would disrupt any and all other radio transmissions in the area with a massive loud bang.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 day ago
“Knallfunkensender”
Literally “Bang-Sparks-Sender”.
Are you sure it’s because of the radio spectrum bang? I always thought it was because of the audible bang.
If someone operated such a thing today, any guesses what the death zone for electronic devices would be?
jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
So like Bluetooth?
dustyData@lemmy.world 2 days ago
But somehow more reliable.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Yes, except you need to buy each bit in a big glass jar
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
There were electrochemical cells (invented in 1800) that provided a constant current for some time.
Idk the details. Look up Galvanic cell, Volta cell.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Sure, but those are still “big glass jars full of electricity”
Crankenstein@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Those practical methods would never have existed if not for Hertz’ experiments. Those were 25 years of other scientists, having seen that this new concept exists, refining his contraption into what eventually would become the machine that we know as a radio.
con_fig@programming.dev 2 days ago
I’m sure someone thinks it’s perfect for their use case, semi relevant xkcd:
Image
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 day ago
At least physics will never get patched. The spark device with zinc spheres will always do that thing.
FCC: And get you arrested