Can’t really be a bit of both because they can’t confirm shit if they don’t know what you look like in the first place. It could be to confirm that you are human (and maybe that you don’t already have an account) but they can’t confirm your “identity”.
Comment on To join Facebook these days, one must record a video selfie
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 days agoI mean, it’s a bit of both.
wischi@programming.dev 3 days ago
qqq@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Sadly they totally can. There are plenty of face databases already that they could use if they wanted, but if you have friends on Facebook you might be in their pictures and Facebook run it’s facial recognition on every picture. I remember over ten years ago getting notified that I could tag myself in friends uploaded pictures that I was in, which was also when I started to get really creeped out by Facebook.
BossDj@lemm.ee 3 days ago
I don’t think they care if you’re real anymore
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 days ago
They care quite a bit.
Bots and spammers make for miserable revenue generators. If you don’t distinguish your marks from your players, there’s no way to make money at the poker table.
skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
I would agree with this if Zuck hadn’t been in the news recently talking about how Meta is desperately filling their userbase with bots, on purpose
Anivia@feddit.org 2 days ago
There is a big difference between bot you control and use for you own gain, and bots that someone else owns and uses for their gain
msage@programming.dev 3 days ago
Their point still stands - the bots need to know who to target to generate revenue, otherwise they waste your money.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
I would agree with this and in fact I do
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 days ago
~ Mitch Hedberg