Comment on Choose a number, 1-5!

DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• Jarix@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I followed that sexy beast all the way to the back end and then noped out a little bit

  source
• PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  It’s got a perfect head but the handle is waaaay too thick

  source
• mostNONheinous@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Oooh, that’s hefty.

  source
• ifeelsick@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  i second this. hear hear. love to feel the weight in my hand

  source
• choab@discuss.online ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  🤮

  source
• ulterno@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  This seems to fit all the points I put somewhere else in this thread.

  • Nice, glancing angles on the teeth
  • Adequate distance between teeth (and unlike mine, the surface between the teeth has been properly smoothed out, making cleaning easier)
  • Nice girth on the handle, making hard presses into the object doable without bending the neck
  • Despite the girth, the handle shape with properly defined edges, reduces the DEX requirement of the user
    • On top of that, you have chamfers and fillets on those edges, reducing pressure on the skin (which I didn’t even think to ask for)
  • None of the form-over-function bs as is done in 2

  This is even better than the fork that I have on my table right now.

  Though that kink on the back end of the handle seems to trigger my OCD.

  source
• Opisek@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Yes, finally a fren-shaped fork. The handle could be flatter and smoother though, but it’s acceptable.

  source