The other car only used emergency breaking, so there’s that.
Comment on Marc Rober shows why Tesla's camera-only self-driving system is dangerous
sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
What about the claims that he only used Autopilot, and not Tesla’s Full Self Driving?
(Context: I hate Tesla, just curious for the sake of an honest argument)
sour@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
He was helping out Tesla by doing that. He was helping them get the wins they got instead of just Tesla massacring the kid every time. Note to self: As a pedestrian and you see a tesla, don’t cross the street.
thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I like to help a Tesla out by throwing it batteries, Philly style.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
All the other cars he tested stopped just fine. Who cares about fiddling with modes and shit.
Snapz@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
“Full shelf driving” still needs to be in quotes. It’s a feature’s brand name for a product that doesn’t actually have full self driving capabilities.
Try not to carry water for their attempted, repeated lie.
Manalith@midwest.social 2 weeks ago
Philip DeFranco had him on Yesterday and he said the reason he didn’t use FSD was that it required you to input an address, but that there isn’t any difference in terms of the sensors being used.
Given that the other car didn’t appear to have a version of FSD either, I’m unclear as to why Autopilot wasn’t the correct move for the most accurate comparison.
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Not any tangible difference in this scenario. Both use vision only. And both use the same computers.
sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
But do they use a different software? Maybe FSD is more advanced than autopilot and could have reacted better?
Just playing devil’s advocate here.
undefinedValue@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
The software may change but these tests show it’s the hardware that’s limiting them. If the Tesla can’t see a kid through fog, it doesn’t matter what software you pick, that kid gunna die.
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Yes, completely different software, but both are limited by machine vision.
RickC137@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Human drivers use vision only
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Fortunately humans have much better hardware and software to accompany that vision.
RickC137@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
And still we cause so many deaths because we are tired, distracted or emotional when driving.
toolverine@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Human drivers generally use sound as well.