A few things are to be considered (things which prove the power of seeing both sides through).
When it shows a message about me supposedly abusing power, it shows a message specifically about me enacting disciplinary measures against people trying to encourage Luigi Mangione copycats. I would have thought I was serving the TOS by doing that, and still would think I am, and some instances have showed they hold the same thoughts and that I’m not just acting on my own subjective sentiments. It’s based on the whole “what’s it to you” response where their thing later comes into play where they say I was supposedly downplaying Musk’s salute. Though I do think intent matters, my thinking is if they’re both fair, then they’re both fair, and if they’re both “dogwhistling”, they’re both “dogwhistling”. Of note, I don’t encourage deaths in any form, I’m just getting mixed messages on what that necessitates.
The “slur + bigotry” part happened two (if not three) years ago. As I explained to the mods of Ask Lemmy, I was fighting with a friend who has DID and BPD because I got fed up with their trust issues and snapped and it manifested like that. Yes, it was transphobic to say that, including using a slur whose origins I didn’t know (it was from One Piece so I thought it was just slang, as why would a kids’ anime have some random slur as a setting name). Feeling guilty immediately afterwards, some friends confirmed to me an apology was the best way to express the sorrow, and I did apologize (the wording about “being told” to refers to not knowing how to manifest it, it doesn’t refer to the apology’s supposed lack of sincerity). In any case, he forgave me, and we have been friends for two years since. Neither of us are the people we were two years ago, and we will both maintain it’s not up to other people to speak for whether the issue has been resolved. He recently came to me for guidance, though, when he was down on himself while someone who is actually associated with the people slandering me (including the person we are responding to) who is still transphobic started going at him (they were in a relationship, with the non-trans boyfriend being unwilling to accept the person who broke up with him is trans). This, sadly fittingly, came after he (the trans friend) defended me while asking why they aren’t focusing on other people in the situation (only to be censored if you look at the original source), showing they don’t actually care about transgender justice, only about whether I look bad in the process or not (because I am the accusers’ grudge).
As for the other matter, I think your first sign there’s more to it than meets the eye is the fact the date on one of them is way after the actual date I got removed from their community, with proof of that date both in other interaction histories as well as the community itself. The context for the other two things can be found in the message chains themselves that are kind of linked to. Both were semantic miscommunications (one around whether “date” was always “romantic”, the other in whatever shipping entailed). The people in charge there knew that and so did nothing. I was removed from that community two years later for being too vocal about being pro-abortion when the art community started filling up with Roe VS Wade content.
Well just look at what I said there. I’m no expert on German law, but I explain right then and there why I was saying the AfD wouldn’t be Nazis, at least to the Germans who still have cultural PTSD over it.
Imagine if we had Germans in our midst. There’d be like a 30% chance right now they’d be a part of the AfD. What are we going to do, ban 30% of Germans from interacting with us?
I don’t know how guilty everyone is, but I do know that someone’s past, if they keep it in the past like you’re trying to say you’ve done in your quest for improvement, shouldn’t be grounds for ostracism and removal of powers every time they try to attain some kind of goal somewhere. I notice what you describe was explain elsewhere too.
Davel banned me from the transgender community in Lemmy ML by the way, just for merely interacting leniently with you. I looked up the whole “rule 1” thing, it’s BS. I also notice someone tried explaining the whole thing in the Fedilore section, only for them to literally make a new rule (rule 3) that wasn’t there before just so they had a reason to censor or remove the explanation.
Back when you tried going to the original commenter foradvice and didn’t get any (either as a diplomatic gesture or due to genuinely wanting to talk to someone), I mentioned all signs pointed to them being exclusionary to you, and considering their continued activity there after the interaction, I think it goes without saying now, which I was going to respond to you saying before seeing that Davel (who one of the things I showed is himself anti-LGBT) banned me from the ML communities.
Davel banned me from the transgender community in Lemmy ML by the way, just for merely interacting leniently with you.
You were banned for being a sockpuppet account, not because you interacted with the other account. Putting words in an admin’s mouth isn’t a good look.
I can confirm @KaneLivesInDeath@lemmy.world is an alt of @shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee. Though @candyman337@lemmy.world was the one that removed her from the moderation team and then appointed her back 3 hours later for unknown reasons.
Davel specifically says the words “they interact with each other” and leads up to “and they all create the same kinds of “ask me”/“casual conversation” posts”, which sounds a lot like what ShiverMeTimbers was saying.
If he is truly the person in charge of his domain, I’d willing to bet, actually bet, that if he (and a bunch of other people, if they wanted to make sure he was being truthful) were to release IP’s, he wouldn’t be able to say anymore that we are the same individual.
As for who appointed me back, Candyman337, who is one of the leading rule enforcers, added me back. They thought you were giving a bombshell until I explained my side of the story, you know, the thing nobody asked me for. Do they think you are being honest now? My faithful side says no.
As I mention in this reply here lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21823992/13383057 Leni has another alt that also has mod privileges, username KaneLivesInDeath. Leni said in a comment that that account is their secondary account… both Leni and their Kane alt are mods on AskLemmy and Casualconversation and whenever Leni gets removed as a mod in those communities they soon get mysteriously appointed as mods again, perhaps because Leni is logging into their Kane alt and re appointing themselves as a mod.
The only other name I have is KaneLivesInDeath. Nobody else here is me in any way. I’d be willing to bet on that and am surprised a self-proclaimed “admin”, like the one we call Davel, would take such a passive approach when you’d expect such a person to have access to all the IP codes.
More accurately put, what Davel means is he thinks you’re some kind of double of me (which makes me wonder if he sees the irony of pingingsomeone who has been accused, by both others and yourself, of being the equivalent of that of the person I was responding to) and thinks you interacting with me is akin to someone puppeteering with themselves (which makes me cast doubt on either his intent or powers as most admins in most places can numerically see someone’s identification, and his undertones contrast with other admins’) and that this is why he thinks you’re lenient towards me.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
A few things are to be considered (things which prove the power of seeing both sides through).
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
Didn’t you leave a comment recently saying the AfD aren’t Nazis?
Image
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Well just look at what I said there. I’m no expert on German law, but I explain right then and there why I was saying the AfD wouldn’t be Nazis, at least to the Germans who still have cultural PTSD over it.
Imagine if we had Germans in our midst. There’d be like a 30% chance right now they’d be a part of the AfD. What are we going to do, ban 30% of Germans from interacting with us?
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
You really think something like that can’t happen again? Look at the AfD’s posters for a start.
Image
Image
ping@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
What are we going to do, not let the fediverse become a Nazi bar?
I should hope so, yes.
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
I don’t know how guilty everyone is, but I do know that someone’s past, if they keep it in the past like you’re trying to say you’ve done in your quest for improvement, shouldn’t be grounds for ostracism and removal of powers every time they try to attain some kind of goal somewhere. I notice what you describe was explain elsewhere too.
Davel banned me from the transgender community in Lemmy ML by the way, just for merely interacting leniently with you. I looked up the whole “rule 1” thing, it’s BS. I also notice someone tried explaining the whole thing in the Fedilore section, only for them to literally make a new rule (rule 3) that wasn’t there before just so they had a reason to censor or remove the explanation.
Back when you tried going to the original commenter for advice and didn’t get any (either as a diplomatic gesture or due to genuinely wanting to talk to someone), I mentioned all signs pointed to them being exclusionary to you, and considering their continued activity there after the interaction, I think it goes without saying now, which I was going to respond to you saying before seeing that Davel (who one of the things I showed is himself anti-LGBT) banned me from the ML communities.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
You were banned for being a sockpuppet account, not because you interacted with the other account. Putting words in an admin’s mouth isn’t a good look.
lemm.ee/post/58290899/18905526
asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 5 weeks ago
I can confirm @KaneLivesInDeath@lemmy.world is an alt of @shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee. Though @candyman337@lemmy.world was the one that removed her from the moderation team and then appointed her back 3 hours later for unknown reasons.
ping@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
This is how @KaneLivesInDeath@lemmy.world got mod powers in the first place:
lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=ModAddCommun…
Image
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Davel specifically says the words “they interact with each other” and leads up to “and they all create the same kinds of “ask me”/“casual conversation” posts”, which sounds a lot like what ShiverMeTimbers was saying.
If he is truly the person in charge of his domain, I’d willing to bet, actually bet, that if he (and a bunch of other people, if they wanted to make sure he was being truthful) were to release IP’s, he wouldn’t be able to say anymore that we are the same individual.
He is also lying when he accuses me of impersonating when I can dig into the past and prove I would be the one being impersonated.
As for who appointed me back, Candyman337, who is one of the leading rule enforcers, added me back. They thought you were giving a bombshell until I explained my side of the story, you know, the thing nobody asked me for. Do they think you are being honest now? My faithful side says no.
ping@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Some of your sock puppet accounts were banned too, including the account you’re replying to here, “Call me Lenny/Leni,” AKA @shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee. lemm.ee/post/58290899
Are there any other fediverse sock puppet accounts we should know about?
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
Hello
As I mention in this reply here lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21823992/13383057 Leni has another alt that also has mod privileges, username KaneLivesInDeath. Leni said in a comment that that account is their secondary account… both Leni and their Kane alt are mods on AskLemmy and Casualconversation and whenever Leni gets removed as a mod in those communities they soon get mysteriously appointed as mods again, perhaps because Leni is logging into their Kane alt and re appointing themselves as a mod.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
The only other name I have is KaneLivesInDeath. Nobody else here is me in any way. I’d be willing to bet on that and am surprised a self-proclaimed “admin”, like the one we call Davel, would take such a passive approach when you’d expect such a person to have access to all the IP codes.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
More accurately put, what Davel means is he thinks you’re some kind of double of me (which makes me wonder if he sees the irony of pinging someone who has been accused, by both others and yourself, of being the equivalent of that of the person I was responding to) and thinks you interacting with me is akin to someone puppeteering with themselves (which makes me cast doubt on either his intent or powers as most admins in most places can numerically see someone’s identification, and his undertones contrast with other admins’) and that this is why he thinks you’re lenient towards me.