shinigamiookamiryuu
@shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to meta@lemm.ee | 2 comments
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
It’s not trolling to point out how it doesn’t add up to immediately call them that.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
They are known for guilt-tripping and trying to gaslight/manipulate mods/admins once they get banned from places, so be ready for that.
Give even one example.
like they’ve done in this thread
You saying someone is me doesn’t make them me.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Then you’ll consider it a good thing that this is a slanderer you are responding to and that not everything is as they seem when it comes to them.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Never after registering have I ever violated the instance’s rules. Some of what they’re saying is out of context while some misinterprets things to seem wrong, and none of it happened in the instance itself, the admins of which have spoken to me as seeing through the majority of what is being said.
- Comment on I heard the admins of lemmy.world were investigating claims about a prominent member in order to form a verdict and I would like to offer myself as witness and someone to call to the stand to question 4 weeks ago:
You say that like showcasing one admin’s actions (one of the dbzer0 ones no less) is sufficient as appeal to the masses, or that appeal to the masses is an excuse to defend people who have literally been stirring things up by accusing the other side of stirring things up.
- Comment on I heard the admins of lemmy.world were investigating claims about a prominent member in order to form a verdict and I would like to offer myself as witness and someone to call to the stand to question 4 weeks ago:
Only the third and fourth one are of me in any way (not sure what relevance anything Mastodon-related would have though), and I have never claimed otherwise. They might as well have included those to make the rest seem genuine. But it isn’t. Nobody else is related to me in any way, save for the fact we are being dragged into the same issues (case in point).
- Comment on I heard the admins of lemmy.world were investigating claims about a prominent member in order to form a verdict and I would like to offer myself as witness and someone to call to the stand to question 4 weeks ago:
See my reply.
- Comment on I heard the admins of lemmy.world were investigating claims about a prominent member in order to form a verdict and I would like to offer myself as witness and someone to call to the stand to question 4 weeks ago:
If you or anyone would just see what the OP has to say, they’d see that the whole point of what they’re saying is that, one, they’re not related to me, and two, that even the few things you are right about happened a long time ago outside the bounds of the local TOS and in circumstances which (at this time) have been reconciled.
We discussed all of that earlier in response to when it was last parroted, with much of the charges being cleared already in both private discussions with admins and in public, with you just parroting at this point. Even what you’re responding to touches upon that, but I doubt you hear what people have to say before trying to leech your slander onto what they’re saying.
The part about my transphobia has been discussed and I was cleared of that first; it would be your turn to answer for your own, considering what the person you’re responding to has to say.
We spoke of the stuff I said in the art community, and those whom I’ve spoken to about it don’t consider it as personality-defining as you claim considering its setting, considering the time, place, and circumstances they took place in.
We are about to talk about the claims of me promoting illegal material, which I wasn’t doing in that image (what I was doing was defending someone from claims that the person I was speaking to was going to call the authorities on them, which in their country does not apply to “drawn” material).
We did not discuss the so-called “Nazi apologia” or what you claim is impersonation, perhaps because it’s a meta-perspective in the former’s case (you don’t know German law/culture/history at all if you are going to try to hammer that point out of spite).
We are literally settling this as you speak and are at the negotiating table (whether or not I feel it should be a matter we must bring to said table). Meanwhile you are spamming the process by continuing to take anything I’ve ever said, whether recent and within a decade’s range, and trying to spin it. Most places would unban those who have been banned as long ago as you are pulling things from. Can you say “stalker”?
Of note, the anon is not me; not every anon is me (are we forgetting this is the same community whose rule enforcers often say they can only take guesses about who people are), and I was telling that anon I’d check with the admins elsewhere about that rumor.
Your witch hunting wherever anyone you dislike steps foot is getting ridiculous, especially considering your history and especially considering several people, including high ranking people, low ranking people, and senior members, have been accused of being me so far, including people like Candyman337 who is well-known as someone who helps out in the groups. Though there will be varying degrees in the validity people think you have, an increasing number of us are beginning to see your slander campaign for what it is.
The people you bring up towards the end aren’t even me, and never have I claimed they are me (and one of them just parrots what you are saying here). People shouldn’t have to tell you when something is excessive like this. Leave us alone!
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Hypothetically, supposing I proved my innocence, would you unban me?
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
As I previously said (but which will probably be ignored, because of how easy it is to lie about something that’s literally in front of people), admins ask for multiple names to work in coordination in rule enforcing depending on the instance. You say all that like I make it a secret who my secondary names are (which your own proofs prove isn’t the case).
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
If that’s what you’re saying, more is going on behind the scenes than you think. I’m still a proud community contributor if that’s what you’re getting at.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
More accurately put, what Davel means is he thinks you’re some kind of double of me (which makes me wonder if he sees the irony of pinging someone who has been accused, by both others and yourself, of being the equivalent of that of the person I was responding to) and thinks you interacting with me is akin to someone puppeteering with themselves (which makes me cast doubt on either his intent or powers as most admins in most places can numerically see someone’s identification, and his undertones contrast with other admins’) and that this is why he thinks you’re lenient towards me.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
You say that like I make the connection between me and the KaneLivesInDeath name a secret. Admins ask for multiple names to work in coordination in rule enforcing depending on the instance.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Same.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
People who see my own stuff can also see I’m not any other ThatWasLeftHanded. Because who knew people would take name usage this personally, especially when the point wasn’t impersonation in the first place?
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Simply sharing a name does not equal impersonation. If I like a name, I use it, I act within the rules of wherever I am to the best of my ability, and I don’t claim to be anyone else (which also requires intent). Going by your logic, everyone on the mod team is impersonating someone. But I know better than to think in those terms. I am not violating any rules, norms, or ethics in sharing a name. And I would say the same about the person Davel accuses me of impersonating even though I predate her. She’s not impersonating me, but she would be by his and your logic. None of what I’m saying is gaslighting or guilt tripping, it’s just common sense.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Well just look at what I said there. I’m no expert on German law, but I explain right then and there why I was saying the AfD wouldn’t be Nazis, at least to the Germans who still have cultural PTSD over it.
Imagine if we had Germans in our midst. There’d be like a 30% chance right now they’d be a part of the AfD. What are we going to do, ban 30% of Germans from interacting with us?
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Could we maybe apply some kind of due process to this situation before proceeding with anymore conclusions? This whole thing, which has chased me around everywhere even though I go into length (including in previous interactions in this chain_ about the many proofs that it should be all a bunch of dead horse issues, has already caused stir among the mods.
I currently have an instance controller who finally expressed enough interest to say “hey, can we talk this out somewhere”, which scarcely anyone up to this point has been willing to do at this point, instead seeing one side of the story and being incited into a frenzy over just that. If anything illustrates why I respect authorities and their decisions in matters like this (in contrast to the populace), this is why (and I suspect they are how I got demoted a second time, until this all gets settled I am guessing).
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Davel specifically says the words “they interact with each other” and leads up to “and they all create the same kinds of “ask me”/“casual conversation” posts”, which sounds a lot like what ShiverMeTimbers was saying.
If he is truly the person in charge of his domain, I’d willing to bet, actually bet, that if he (and a bunch of other people, if they wanted to make sure he was being truthful) were to release IP’s, he wouldn’t be able to say anymore that we are the same individual.
He is also lying when he accuses me of impersonating when I can dig into the past and prove I would be the one being impersonated.
As for who appointed me back, Candyman337, who is one of the leading rule enforcers, added me back. They thought you were giving a bombshell until I explained my side of the story, you know, the thing nobody asked me for. Do they think you are being honest now? My faithful side says no.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
I have never, ever used any secondary name to reappoint me.
What a liar you are (makes me wonder if those who “upvote” what you say are “alts”).
Admins ask for multiple names to work in coordination in rule enforcing depending on the instance. I make it no secret who my secondary names are. It also should be made clear “ShiverMeTimbers” is not one of them. I’d be willing to bet life and death on that. Supposing you or someone else extracted data/info from me, you would find what I’m saying to be true.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
Again, not me. The only other name I have is KaneLivesInDeath. I’d be willing to bet life and death on that and am surprised a self-proclaimed “admin”, like the one we call Davel, would take such a passive approach when you’d expect such a person to have access to all the IP codes.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
The only other name I have is KaneLivesInDeath. Nobody else here is me in any way. I’d be willing to bet on that and am surprised a self-proclaimed “admin”, like the one we call Davel, would take such a passive approach when you’d expect such a person to have access to all the IP codes.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
The reasons for adding me back were discussed within Matrix. I also don’t make the connection between me and the KaneLivesInDeath name a secret. Admins ask for multiple names to work in coordination in rule enforcing depending on the instance. I thought all rule enforcers knew.
- Comment on A troll (https://lemm.ee/u/shinigamiookamiryuu) is a new moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world. What can be done about this? 4 weeks ago:
A few things are to be considered (things which prove the power of seeing both sides through).
- When it shows a message about me supposedly abusing power, it shows a message specifically about me enacting disciplinary measures against people trying to encourage Luigi Mangione copycats. I would have thought I was serving the TOS by doing that, and still would think I am, and some instances have showed they hold the same thoughts and that I’m not just acting on my own subjective sentiments. It’s based on the whole “what’s it to you” response where their thing later comes into play where they say I was supposedly downplaying Musk’s salute. Though I do think intent matters, my thinking is if they’re both fair, then they’re both fair, and if they’re both “dogwhistling”, they’re both “dogwhistling”. Of note, I don’t encourage deaths in any form, I’m just getting mixed messages on what that necessitates.
- The “slur + bigotry” part happened two (if not three) years ago. As I explained to the mods of Ask Lemmy, I was fighting with a friend who has DID and BPD because I got fed up with their trust issues and snapped and it manifested like that. Yes, it was transphobic to say that, including using a slur whose origins I didn’t know (it was from One Piece so I thought it was just slang, as why would a kids’ anime have some random slur as a setting name). Feeling guilty immediately afterwards, some friends confirmed to me an apology was the best way to express the sorrow, and I did apologize (the wording about “being told” to refers to not knowing how to manifest it, it doesn’t refer to the apology’s supposed lack of sincerity). In any case, he forgave me, and we have been friends for two years since. Neither of us are the people we were two years ago, and we will both maintain it’s not up to other people to speak for whether the issue has been resolved. He recently came to me for guidance, though, when he was down on himself while someone who is actually associated with the people slandering me (including the person we are responding to) who is still transphobic started going at him (they were in a relationship, with the non-trans boyfriend being unwilling to accept the person who broke up with him is trans). This, sadly fittingly, came after he (the trans friend) defended me while asking why they aren’t focusing on other people in the situation (only to be censored if you look at the original source), showing they don’t actually care about transgender justice, only about whether I look bad in the process or not (because I am the accusers’ grudge).
- As for the other matter, I think your first sign there’s more to it than meets the eye is the fact the date on one of them is way after the actual date I got removed from their community, with proof of that date both in other interaction histories as well as the community itself. The context for the other two things can be found in the message chains themselves that are kind of linked to. Both were semantic miscommunications (one around whether “date” was always “romantic”, the other in whatever shipping entailed). The people in charge there knew that and so did nothing. I was removed from that community two years later for being too vocal about being pro-abortion when the art community started filling up with Roe VS Wade content.
- Comment on Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old) 5 weeks ago:
That there is more to the context than what you see (not to mention it happened years ago with any amends that needed to be made having been made, the kind of thing pictures wouldn’t show) and that the person you initially were responding to who is trying to spread around the claims “about Triagonal” has been a part of an ongoing harassment/stalking/slandering campaign against the people they’re referring to, which is what I was alluding to.
The last two pictures portray things that took place in response to other things. The other person in the first one only got upset because she was recommending something far more NSFW and someone missed a beat when a second thing was suggested which didn’t have any inherently non-platonic-related undertones. Same with the picture after it. Everyone was throwing loose answers out there in response to a joke thread about an art phenomenon, and there was only one pairing not taken up.
The first picture’s vagueness aside, it’s amazing anyone takes someone’s word for plain grey text on a plain white backdrop that portrays something you’d expect to be impossible if the individual doing it is banned from that place for whatever reason they got banned for. It’s the equivalent of accusing someone of writing their own name on a bathroom wall when the accused person has been dead for a month. Is gullibility just the modus operandi for fediverse revolutionaries?
- Comment on Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old) 5 weeks ago:
I can’t point out conflicts of interest?
- Comment on Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old) 5 weeks ago:
The point being that doesn’t square well with the original verdict.
- Comment on Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old) 5 weeks ago: