Comment on Anon experiences freedom

RejZoR@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• Floshie@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Why no, they specifically mentioned it being highly secure

  source

  • spicytuna62@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    “Trust us, bro.”

    source
  • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    See the lock icon near the URL? It says you’re secure so don’t worry bro.

    source
• echodot@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Well at least it’s not going to the federal government so it should be somewhat safe

  source

  • HK65@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The third party has a very secure agreement to very securely sell data to 572 advertising partners and that is very securely being bought by the FBI.

    Not that outlandish, since the FBI and the US police already buys advertising data streams to get access to data they are prohibited to collect directly.

    It’s so bad there are already middlemen who buy data and compile it into products for law enforcement.

    source

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You forgot to mention that of course 253 of the 572 advertising partners consider their use to be a ‘legitimate interest’ under privacy legislation despite being nothing even close.

      source

      • zerosignal@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Privacy legislation? That sounds unconstitutional

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Isn’t ‘Legitimate interest’ a EU thing?

        source
  • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If it was last administration I’d say it’s just slightly annoying that our day was going to the federal government. But it’s admin…maybe not

    source

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I don’t want any administration to be able to. They should absolutely be able to buy it so long as they have a warrant for that instance of that individual or if the individual agrees to cooperate in that instance without coercion.

      source