Comment on [deleted]

• xmunk@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Oh hey look, it’s a personal attack. That definitely doesn’t make me think that your argument is in bad faith.

  Opinions don’t always need to advocate for both sides, presenting a sane and batshit arguments on equal footing is a huge problem in modern media and allowed a lot of Trump’s bullshit arguments to gain ground. I think that making an effort to devil’s advocate in arguments generally makes the argument read stronger but it isn’t required.

  source

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Is it a personal attack? They wrote it and don’t understand it’s expected in an argument that you include the counter argument and provide evidence why your position is correct.

    source

    • Apepollo11@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Where do you think this is?

      Lemmy isn’t university. There’s no implied or expressed expectations of “academic argument”.

      source

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I got a paragraph telling me that it is absurd to expect to know the counter narrative when ac5ually it’s absurd to believe anything withoutnone.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• meco03211@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Ad hominem non sequitur? You’re going places.

  source

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Man, getting really worked up over this.

    source
• db2@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Found the bad actor. 👆

  source

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    How am I bad actor?

    source