Oh yeah I saw that headline when I got up this morning and it made me happy to see. But talk me down the tree a little further if you can.
In the current state I donât see how it matters. Iâm glad they did it. I appreciate the gesture, and I think it was an important one. But I feel like were all still pretending that laws and norms matter when clearly they no longer do for Trump and anyone under him.
What exactly stops him from having these people forcibly removed and/or their access to government resources cut, their paychecks held, their clearances revoked, etc? Who is in charge of those things that can stand up to that?
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca â¨4⊠â¨days⊠ago
What is the consequence of not following these rules?
If the only consequence is a lawsuit he doesnât have to pay personally, then I donât think he cares.
NvrLmp@lemmy.world â¨4⊠â¨days⊠ago
I suppose if the firings are regarded as âofficial acts,â the courts will support POTUS on this one.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca â¨4⊠â¨days⊠ago
Currently the consequence is they arenât accepting the termination of their enjoyment and arenât leaving.
If the consequence of not following the rules means it doesnât get enforced then he cares very much.
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca â¨4⊠â¨days⊠ago
Why does trump care if someone he tried to fire refuses to accept that theyâre fired. He can still hire a replacement and pretend the person he âfiredâ doesnât exist, and as long as the rest of the bureaucracy plays along with him (which it always seems to) then trump faces no consequences for breaking the rules.
This happened time and time again last term where he broke norms and rules that had no codified repercussions. Dems would say âyou canât do that, itâs not allowedâ but heâd do it anyways and succeed.
The checks placed on the POTUS need to have actual teeth and not just be a gentlemenâs agreement