Comment on Anon gets rid of crackheads
Dasus@lemmy.world 4 days agoOh it’s not about this being hard.
It’s about me saying I literally did not notice as I do not see gender in words like you do.
I admit that when using English I notice it more when it’s a feminine pronoun than when it’s a masculine one.
The point I’m making is that I did not misgender anyone. If anything, I disgendered English.
So no. I’m not going to admit to misgendering someone, when I most certainly don’t do that on purpose. What I might do is not read the username of a person I’m replying to. As I prefer responding to the message, not the person.
It’s not my fault English isn’t gender neutral when I am. I naturally speak and think in a way that does not account for gender. Would you like for me to start replacing that with archaic gender stereotypes?
Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
No you didn’t, masculine is still a gender. I’m totally willing to believe that this was an innocent mistake to begin with but by tripling down on it like this you’re just being a dick.
You understand that English does have gender neutral pronouns, right? “His” just isn’t one of them. At any rate, given that Rose has her pronouns in her display name there’s no need to use neutral language anyway.
Madison420@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Calm down guy, it funny even seem like the person you’re talking about took offense with it. Why claim their outage for your own?
Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
yawn
bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 days ago
This whole-ass thread is terrible and I downvoted everyone
Dasus@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Name a gender-neutral singular pronoun from English that isn’t “it”.
clickyello@lemmy.world 3 days ago
they
Dasus@lemmy.world 3 days ago
“They” is plural, not singular.
It can be used to refer to single people, and using a plural instead of a singular is a very common way for many languages to show deference to the person you’re speaking to. Like in Finland. English already did that and did it so much it got rid of the second person singular, as “you” is a second person plural. This ofc meant there was nowhere for English to go vis-a-vis showing deference, so English really stresses titles. Narcissism of small differences, really.
Based on the votes I’ll have to disagree and say you don’t really know what others think.
So, to reiterate, you would rather that I start using archaic stereotypes to think about people and language? I have to condition myself into thinking of everyone as either a boy or a girl, and always make a mental note to gender someone as soon as I make contact with them? The first thing I do should be to gender them? That’s your takeaway?
Maybe try reading my comments again, with some thought. You’re not the hero here.
the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
Also gendered language btw
Madison420@lemmy.world 3 days ago
What is projection alex?