Maybe he didn’t have the money to launch a suit.
Comment on Disney sued for $10billion over Moana 2
NineMileTower@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I want to see his trailer and screenplay from 2003.
From another article:
This is not the first time Woodall has taken legal action against Disney. A previous lawsuit regarding the first Moana film was dismissed in November last year due to the statute of limitations. However, the release of the sequel has allowed Woodall to file a new complaint.
If he had evidence of his creation being stolen, why did he wait so long? This all just seems like a cash grab or something to me. Also, $10 billion? That’s a good way to be dismissed as a fraudster.
skribe@aussie.zone 1 year ago
NineMileTower@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That could be the case.
panchobarnes@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Nice…
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 year ago
stealing from the public domain
There is no such thing
NineMileTower@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ok, sorry. They didn’t steal. They used public domain stories to make billions of dollars and used it to fight tooth and nail for their characters to not enter public domain and lengthen copyright laws for years and years.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yes! :(
thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 1 year ago
why did he wait so long?
Copyright laws protect 70 years after the death of the author. If Disney infringed his intellectual property, why should a couple of years matter and his case be dismissed?
Aphelion@lemm.ee 1 year ago
SARGE@startrek.website 1 year ago
Man, I used to believe that.
The last 8 years have shown me otherwise.
ech@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Is 8 years a reasonable time for that? I’m genuinely asking. Assuming he had no reason to act before the first movie, as a layman, that seems like a long time to prepare for.
NineMileTower@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s a good point too.