Comment on For a group that considers .world to be Reddit 2.0 and a "CIA propaganda front" they seem to get awfully mad whenever it comes up

• petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Okay, but debate pervert is really funny, though.

  source

  • finley@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I laughed when I first read it. I still have no idea what it means.

    source
• Rhoeri@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I’ve seen people banned with “liberal” being the reason.

  source

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I mean, at the limit, if they were clear in their rules thay only radical leftists are allowed (which you would assume given it’s called ML - marxist leninism, it might be acceptable).

    The genocide denial and masquarading as a neutral all purpose instance isn’t though.

    source
  • fuck_the_admins_lol@lemmings.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Yeah why would a communist instance ban right-wingers?

    Do you have any idea how anything work at all?

    source
• theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Nice set of logical fallacies in this comment, and I don’t see any citations supporting your anecdote.

  source

  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I don’t see you actually countering his statement, just throwing random sentences out.

    source

    • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I just did what he did little buddy. There’s nothing to “counter” lil Shapiro, the world doesn’t work like that.

      source

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        So, still just throwing out random sentences thinking you are making a point.

        source
  • finley@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    “no u”

    Got lots of that, too. It’s like speaking to a 4 year-old

    source

    • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      If you think the world works like high School debate clubs, you need to head back to Ben Shapiro’s butt hit basement emporium and get back to circle jerking over pointless pedantry that never affects the meaning of a message or argument.

      I was just making fun of you, since, you know, you’re just a generic right-winger using the same tactics and excuses.

      source

      • finley@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Holy projection, Batman. You projected any harder, you‘d need an IMAX theater.

        Of course, the childish insults were totally expected. And, of course, you couldn’t be more wrong about me. That’s what you get when you make the foolish mistake of assuming you know strangers on the Internet.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Fallacy fallacy: only because it contains a fallacy (or a bunch) the argument isn’t necessarily void.

  Still stacking fallacies isn’t usually a sign of a good and or valid argument.

  source

  • finley@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    It wasn’t a fallacy fallacy. Their entire argument, nay, their entire identity, was based on a foundation of logical fallacies.

    And no, their argument was definitely not valid in any way.

    source

    • Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Moving the goalpost fallacy. You wrote in your comment to which I replied that no argument can be made against pointing out that someone’s arguments contains fallacies, which is not true.

      I wasn’t present as you got hurt arguing on the Internet so I couldn’t anticipate that you were up against someone who’s “entire identity was based on logical fallacies” (ad hominem).

      source

      • finley@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Wow, nice straw man you got there, lol

        source

        • -> View More Comments