CS Lewis has never had to choose which travel companion to cannibalize during a mountaintop snow storm. Unless your acquaintances look particularly diseased, they’re usually the easiest choice. Friendship can save your life. Take that, you timeless fuck
Comment on Anon tries to solve his problems
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 month ago
To paraphrase CS Lewis, "~Friendship~ casual sex is unnecessary, like philosophy, like art. It has no survival value; rather it is one of those things which give value to survival.”
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
elvith@feddit.org 1 month ago
Casual sex […] has no survival value
I wonder how many people less of our species were on earth w/o casual sex. It doesn’t have survival value for one personally, though.
SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 month ago
I have no education on this matter but I’m going to confidently say at least 1/8 of the planet. 1/5 of the western world, and asia, I’d say 1/3
taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Depends on what you count as casual sex. People grow emotionally more attached to friends with benefits than to strangers too and might help them in a tough situation over a stranger or mere acquaintance.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 month ago
IDK. I think about killing myself a lot less when I’m getting laid regularly.
Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
man, imagine thinking friends has no survival value, if you didn’t know Lewis’ family was well off, this would make it obvious.