wasn’t most of the fossil fuel increase under the obama admin an increase in natural gas? Rather than oil/coal, in order to replace, said infrastructure, as it’s cleaner.
Comment on Caption this.
GrymEdm@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago4 years? Climate scientists have been warning the world about climate change for about half a century, and urgently for a few decades. Bill Nye specifically has videos going back at least 13 years.
Don’t just blame the 2017-2021 Trump presidency either for the current high, if that is what you mean by your “reworking the energy grid/vehicles in 4 years” argument. Oil production hit it’s lowest since the 50’s under Bush Jr. then climbed again dramatically through Obama’s 2 terms. Then the Biden presidency started after a year of “low” production (that was actually higher than anything pre-2017) before climbing again steeply during the last 4 years. This is a problem of both parties, and the worst of it has happened in the last 13 years of which 9 were under a Dem president.
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
May be cleaner to burn but we’re getting it by fracking which is terrible.
KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
i mean, mining coal is also objectively terrible for the environment so…
someguy3@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I think you’ve horribly misread what I said.
The chain is about Biden and his 4 years. People want the Dems (Biden in this case) to solve the whole literal problem in their term. In the case of Biden, it was 4 years. 2 years really when you consider he only had the House or Reps for 2 years.
Both parties? We all know the GOP isn’t going to do shit. They will do the exact opposite, actually. So it’s only Dems.
Past that I have no idea what point you’re trying to make. US oil production is not US oil usage. It was the fracking boom that increased production. As for dips, then there was the 2008 great recession and covid which changed everything for a few years each. Like you’re focused on wrong fry, small fry, and taking it out of context. Obama? Guess what Obama learned from Gore? That running on an environmental policy was a losing proposition. He focused on health care. His thanks for that was to lose the house for the next 6 years. Guess the left didn’t want anything for 6 years of his presidency.
GrymEdm@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Nothing I’m seeing in the data suggests that Dems were meaningfully impeding/capping oil production. You may say it’s because the environment is a losing political proposition (and you may be right). But in doing so you’re just assigning a reason fir the trends and timing that show dual-party responsibility.
someguy3@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
… I’ve never been at a bigger loss for words.
You have a lot to learn.
GrymEdm@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
BTW, are you trying to say US oil usage has dropped? Because that’s not the case.
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
4-10% of oil goes to plastic. Oil storage reserves are full and significant capacity isn’t being added.
So your critic is right. Oil produced is oil burned. If not in the US than elsewhere which affects global warming just the same.
Other than that I agree with everything else you said.