Solumbran
@Solumbran@lemmy.world
- Comment on is it weird to have your own religious beliefs system 9 hours ago:
What you have is beliefs, which is normal.
A religion is a scam where people are told that all of their beliefs are or should be the same, which is absurd.
Believe what you feel is right, question it often, and that’s all. Religions are useless at best, dangerous in general.
- Comment on [deleted] 10 hours ago:
This comment section manages to be even more horrifying than the question.
Why is everyone so creepy, seriously?
- Comment on Why do so many people regardless of whether their reasonings are justified or not pinpoint South Park for ruining a generation of millenials? 1 day ago:
Another typical far-right thing, building a strawman and going crazy on it.
I don’t want to punch people I disagree with, I want to punch nazis. The fact that you are getting so concerned by that is strange, because I am not scared of people who hunt nazis. It’s actually pretty easy to not be a nazi.
So the question really is, why are you so worried about the wellbeing of nazis?
And because I know what you’re going to say, what I consider a nazi is someone that wants to oppress minorities or goes against their existence. If you defend that, then you’re part of them.
- Comment on Why do so many people regardless of whether their reasonings are justified or not pinpoint South Park for ruining a generation of millenials? 1 day ago:
Ah yes, the typical far-right technique of mirroring attacks against them.
“We’re not antisemitic nazis, the leftists are, look at them criticizing Israel”.
“I’m colorblind, maybe you’re the racist one by focusing so much on color”
And whatnot.
Let me guess, next you’re going to start mentioning freedom of speech?
- Comment on Why do so many people regardless of whether their reasonings are justified or not pinpoint South Park for ruining a generation of millenials? 1 day ago:
Yeah I want to beat up nazis, and if you feel bad for the nazis then guess which side that puts you in.
The point that you’re proving isn’t what you think it is.
- Comment on Why are expressions like "women artists" or "women writers" used? 1 day ago:
Female has meanings that mean “female sex”, woman doesn’t.
Language influences and even if theoretically, female can mean woman, it still adds an implicit link to sex.
As you said, language is subjective, so even if a dictionary says that female can refer to women, in practice as someone else pointed out, you can talk about a female dog, you can’t talk about a woman dog.
- Comment on Why are expressions like "women artists" or "women writers" used? 2 days ago:
I don’t know, using new pronouns can also sound clumsy, doesn’t mean it’s a bad idea.
The strong implicit links in language between sex and gender are not really helping anyone, and a bit of clumsiness for a while isn’t such a big cost.
I don’t know if that was the intention of the example you mentioned obviously.
- Comment on Why are expressions like "women artists" or "women writers" used? 2 days ago:
A woman isn’t necessarily female.
- Comment on Why do so many people regardless of whether their reasonings are justified or not pinpoint South Park for ruining a generation of millenials? 5 days ago:
That’s such a stupid take.
People who are “hostile” over social justice, are hostile against social injustice. Social injustice is violent, in many many ways.
Your take is basically “I don’t like these people, because they are violent against violence to try to fix it”. I’m sure that stagnating in violence is better than to try to fix it, huh.
Tell me that you’re a privileged brat without telling me that you’re a privileged brat.
- Comment on [Video] British granny in a wheelchair escorted by a gang of police officers for supporting Palestine Action, risking a 14 year prison sentence for supporting terrorism. 1 week ago:
It’s fine, let’s just not question “democracies” for a bit longer and see what happens
- Comment on Would people like a "X posts per Y" rate limit for this community? 2 weeks ago:
This post is literally about amending the rules to block the kind of shitty spam the discussion is about. Your argument is to not change the rules because there are already rules?
- Comment on Would people like a "X posts per Y" rate limit for this community? 2 weeks ago:
Yeah because when a place not only lacks content, but on top of that most of it is shitty spam, it makes people want to engage a lot more, right?
- Comment on Someone said I post an average of 6 posts a day. Where did they get that type of information? Not upset curious cause it's another way I can compliment others with facts about them. 2 weeks ago:
So you’re an ex-coder huh
- Comment on Male ejaculation travels at an avg speed of 28 mph. How come it doesn't blow the back of a woman or male neck out or cause other serious damage at that speed? 2 weeks ago:
“Woman or male”
Gosh these questions never stop getting more and more stupid, this place really needs to be renamed “increasingly stupid questions”
- Comment on How can AI act without initial human input? Does this show AI can have freewill or am I deceived? 3 weeks ago:
So people still have absolutely not a single clue what “AIs” are and think that ChatGPT is a sentient android or something.
But then when you tell them to not kill or torture animals, the same people will refuse to acknowledge that they are sentient.
What a pathetic humanity.
- Comment on If Sodom and Gomorrah were real. How bad were they that god had to come down and smite them? Are they any comparison to today's society? 5 weeks ago:
If you assume that god follows reason and morals, and is as described in the bible, then he’s horrible and evil and is basically Satan but worse.
So there’s not really any discussion.
- Comment on Are Edward Snowden and Jeffrey Epstein assets? 5 weeks ago:
Yes, this question is very legitimate, absolutely-not-suspicious-one-week-olf-account.
- Comment on What are your thoughts on people who say hate speech is free speech? 5 weeks ago:
Free speech is used nonsensically, because it is now mostly used by far-right extremists that try to manipulate their audience. It doesn’t mean just “free speech” anymore.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
You can tell that information is reliable when it’s a bunch of screenshots of an AI slopmmary
- Comment on Why don't people afraid of AI instead use it while they can to make decent money? 1 month ago:
“Why are people with morals or reason not doing immoral and unreasonable things out of pure selfishness?”
This post says a lot about you mate.
- Comment on How come the US does not welcome the so called "immigrants" and when they get a job or are waiting for their green card just tax them some more until citizens? Would solve many problems. 1 month ago:
Is it fascist to consider that minorities need to struggle more than the majority, and need to be exploited for absolutely no reason other than to punish them for not being born privileged?
Yes. Yes, that’s fascist. As fuck.
- Comment on How come the US does not welcome the so called "immigrants" and when they get a job or are waiting for their green card just tax them some more until citizens? Would solve many problems. 1 month ago:
Yeah I don’t have you tagged as a fascist for no reason.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
It wasn’t a question, it was an attack.
As I said, go do your bad faith propaganda somewhere else.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Yeah, more loaded questions, fucking sealioners.
For the sake of it I’ll explain, even though I’m obviously wasting my time:
- “outcome” of what? You’re asking questions with holes hoping that I’ll fill them for you
- AI code is not the same as AIs, you are mixing two different things together that weren’t, in the initial discussion
- "return to a pre-AI world" is worded to make it sound like “going back to the past before AIs”, that’s absurd and also tries to make it sound like the future has to have AI, all we can do is to delay the inevitable. That’s bullshit. The idea of destroying AI is to reach a “post-AI” word but that wording doesn’t fit your narrative
- we weren’t talking about beliefs of what is the likely outcome, but about what is the end goal. On top of that, why would it have to be likely? The nazis getting pushed back by the resistance was an unlikely outcome, and yet no one with a brain would say that it was stupid to resist. Morals are not about likelihood, they’re about what is acceptable and what is not.
All in all, you’re not talking in good faith, which is what I was expecting. Go do your AI propaganda somewhere else.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Yes it does, it shows that you have no motivation.
Also it’s easier to get rid of AIs (in the current meaning of the expression) than to get rid of nazis, as people don’t need datacenters to be nazis.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Lmao.
“For the anti-nazis here, what is the end goal?”
Simple: getting rid of a horrible shit that is on its way to destroy the world.
This is not a stupid question, it’s a fucking stupid loaded question that can fuck off of here.
- Comment on Why do people get mad at you for using Wikipedia, but treat Google and AI chatbots like they're gospel? 1 month ago:
People that criticize the use of Wikipedia are generally doing so to intentionally be manipulative. They use the vague confusion around how Wikipedia works to make it look unreliable, then imply that it makes whatever you say wrong.
Generally, it is a fascist take, because fascists hate the idea of a community-based anything. If there is no central authority/boss, then they hate it.
AI is seen as the opposite, it is this one magic entity that you refer to and tells you whatever you want to hear and leads you to believe that they are amazing. Which coincidentally is what all fascist politicians do.
Anyone that considers LLMs to be anything else than worthless has opinions that are as worthless anyway, so I’d advise ignoring them.
- Comment on How do you distance yourself from your country when it doesn't represent your views anymore so you won't be viewed by the rest of the world as part of the problem? 1 month ago:
Funny in which direction your examples go.
- Comment on If we take physicality out and the tran debate. Doesn't almost everything boil down to a single choice? Like alcohol, tobacco, weed, heroin and other addictives. More inside. 1 month ago:
I don’t know, it is starting to seem a bit like it, but maga or not I know to not trust this user…
- Comment on If we take physicality out and the tran debate. Doesn't almost everything boil down to a single choice? Like alcohol, tobacco, weed, heroin and other addictives. More inside. 1 month ago:
I had this user tagged as a person defending rapists, now I’ll have to add that they’re a nazi too I guess.