Solumbran

@Solumbran@lemmy.world

This is a remote user, information on this page may be incomplete. View at Source ↗

⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:
You can tell that information is reliable when it’s a bunch of screenshots of an AI slopmmary
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why don't people afraid of AI instead use it while they can to make decent money?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:
“Why are people with morals or reason not doing immoral and unreasonable things out of pure selfishness?”

This post says a lot about you mate.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come the US does not welcome the so called "immigrants" and when they get a job or are waiting for their green card just tax them some more until citizens? Would solve many problems.⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:
Is it fascist to consider that minorities need to struggle more than the majority, and need to be exploited for absolutely no reason other than to punish them for not being born privileged?

Yes. Yes, that’s fascist. As fuck.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come the US does not welcome the so called "immigrants" and when they get a job or are waiting for their green card just tax them some more until citizens? Would solve many problems.⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:
Yeah I don’t have you tagged as a fascist for no reason.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:
It wasn’t a question, it was an attack.

As I said, go do your bad faith propaganda somewhere else.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:
Yeah, more loaded questions, fucking sealioners.

For the sake of it I’ll explain, even though I’m obviously wasting my time:
- “outcome” of what? You’re asking questions with holes hoping that I’ll fill them for you
- AI code is not the same as AIs, you are mixing two different things together that weren’t, in the initial discussion
- "return to a pre-AI world" is worded to make it sound like “going back to the past before AIs”, that’s absurd and also tries to make it sound like the future has to have AI, all we can do is to delay the inevitable. That’s bullshit. The idea of destroying AI is to reach a “post-AI” word but that wording doesn’t fit your narrative
- we weren’t talking about beliefs of what is the likely outcome, but about what is the end goal. On top of that, why would it have to be likely? The nazis getting pushed back by the resistance was an unlikely outcome, and yet no one with a brain would say that it was stupid to resist. Morals are not about likelihood, they’re about what is acceptable and what is not.
All in all, you’re not talking in good faith, which is what I was expecting. Go do your AI propaganda somewhere else.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:
Yes it does, it shows that you have no motivation.

Also it’s easier to get rid of AIs (in the current meaning of the expression) than to get rid of nazis, as people don’t need datacenters to be nazis.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:
Lmao.

“For the anti-nazis here, what is the end goal?”

Simple: getting rid of a horrible shit that is on its way to destroy the world.

This is not a stupid question, it’s a fucking stupid loaded question that can fuck off of here.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why do people get mad at you for using Wikipedia, but treat Google and AI chatbots like they're gospel?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:
People that criticize the use of Wikipedia are generally doing so to intentionally be manipulative. They use the vague confusion around how Wikipedia works to make it look unreliable, then imply that it makes whatever you say wrong.

Generally, it is a fascist take, because fascists hate the idea of a community-based anything. If there is no central authority/boss, then they hate it.

AI is seen as the opposite, it is this one magic entity that you refer to and tells you whatever you want to hear and leads you to believe that they are amazing. Which coincidentally is what all fascist politicians do.

Anyone that considers LLMs to be anything else than worthless has opinions that are as worthless anyway, so I’d advise ignoring them.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How do you distance yourself from your country when it doesn't represent your views anymore so you won't be viewed by the rest of the world as part of the problem?⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Funny in which direction your examples go.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If we take physicality out and the tran debate. Doesn't almost everything boil down to a single choice? Like alcohol, tobacco, weed, heroin and other addictives. More inside.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
I don’t know, it is starting to seem a bit like it, but maga or not I know to not trust this user…
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If we take physicality out and the tran debate. Doesn't almost everything boil down to a single choice? Like alcohol, tobacco, weed, heroin and other addictives. More inside.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
I had this user tagged as a person defending rapists, now I’ll have to add that they’re a nazi too I guess.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come people don't compliment other people on great word usage? If someone use the word lets say ecclesiastical or something like that they do not get complimented it shows they respect English.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Are you trying to make it into a competition? Most people can list hardships like that, and sure, I do not doubt that you have a hard life. But as a matter of fact, you are able to read and write, to have the internet and to know how to use it, to have been educated enough to know how to learn things from the internet (and not fall into sects and conspiracy theories), to be in a country that supports you and doesn’t just kick you in the street, to be openly trans without being killed, to speak the language of your country (I assume), to be in a legal situation in your country, etc. Pretending like you have no privileges while you are writing posts online to say that it’s people’s fault if they have a shit life is not working.

Also, according to your logic, your situation is also your fault. If education is so easy to get and everything is in your control, why don’t you have an expertise in a subject that cannot be done by AI, and get a job?

Saying that people’s shitty situation comes from them being lazy or whatever is just allowing the world to stay a shit place by refusing to admit that things are unfair from the start. Education is not something obvious, for most people and in a lot of countries. And the fact that you’re trying to focus on either your situation or mine (I never said I was not privileged, and unlike you I’m not going to start listing all the weird shit I had and have to go through, so I don’t see why you felt the need to say that I have an internet device) while being unable to think about people who are in very different situations from yours is a bit alarming.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come people don't compliment other people on great word usage? If someone use the word lets say ecclesiastical or something like that they do not get complimented it shows they respect English.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Is this an answer from an LLM or something? I’m confused.

Also saying things like that implies that everyone having shit lives are in their situation by choice. It’s typically something that only people with nice lives say, because they want to delude themselves into thinking that they deserve it, and that people with shit lives deserve it too; it’s obviously easier than to admit that you are lucky and privileged and that the world is an unfair place filled with undeserved suffering.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come people don't compliment other people on great word usage? If someone use the word lets say ecclesiastical or something like that they do not get complimented it shows they respect English.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Wow, I expected filthy messages but yet that went above and beyond.

Maybe instead of piano lessons you should have found morals lessons instead.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come people don't compliment other people on great word usage? If someone use the word lets say ecclesiastical or something like that they do not get complimented it shows they respect English.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Because education has been used as a class discriminator since forever.

You want people to stop preferring football over books? Then make schools fair and equal, instead of favouring dominant classes and money.

The reason Trump got elected is because he used fascism as a tool (the same kind that you’re using actually, “make America great again” doesn’t convince people who think everything is perfect), not because of education. And it’s not like education prevents propaganda from working (it often helps it actually) so this is just bullshit.

If you want people to be smart, first stop this moronic class discrimination.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Amazing to have a second point that explains how you could have the guts to post the first point.

What a loser though.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
I don’t go to your history, I just have tagged your account because many, many times when I see one of your posts or comment they have some form of creepiness to them. And so after seeing so many creepy posts with the same username, I started seeing the pattern.

And for example, this justification of “engagement” seems already pretty suspicious on its own.

If you are actually genuine, then you really, really need to work on the kind of things you’re posting and the way you present them, because they make your account look like a troll account of some sort. And you might need to search for interesting discussions, rather than engagement. Quality over quantity.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
This account was always like that
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
So someone who was saying that violence, accidents, and rape are all in the same category, is now wanting to know how to hide a dead body? Yeah nothing suspicious here.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What are some of the biggest continuity errors in Star Trek?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
I mean, they were still trying to show it as James Bond-cool (which I mean, works if you see that James Bond is pretty problematic, but most people don’t)… They were shown as a bit evil, but also as the “cool, edgy dudes that do what needs to be done”, but other shows managed to do worse somehow.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What are some of the biggest continuity errors in Star Trek?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Let’s not forget the part where they want to go in the future to stop control because they think they can’t destroy it, then control gets destroyed, then they go in the future anyway.

Also, I don’t think any star trek depicted section 31 in a way that didn’t make the show worse, but Discovery really went the extra mile
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What are some of the biggest continuity errors in Star Trek?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
The church in Discovery.

I am convinced that they put it there without having an explanation yet, then forgot they did it when they made the explanation.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How would you feel if someone said you deserve cancer or to die?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
There’s been a bunch of accounts that all ask the same weird questions, that all seem blurrily related in a bad way. The names mentioned above are some of the ones that are quite definitely from the same person/bot.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How would you feel if someone said you deserve cancer or to die?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
So what account of yours got banned, that you had to make another one and say shit within less than a day of creating it?
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why are tv shows about billionaires so popular?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Because people are brainwashed by capitalism, and so while they hate the rich (which is normal) they also admire them and feel like they got rich out of hard work. And then there’s the ones that are even more obviously not rich from any kind of work, and people see it as “unfair” and get even more involved.

In the end, it’s a toxic love-hate relationship that just shows how capitalism won by distracting and burying shit under more shit.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come Mark Wahlberg got a pass for being the crap out of a Vietnamese guy. But Kevin Spacey, Bill Cosby, Weinstein, do not get a pass? Beside the sexual aspect what is the difference?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
It’s funny how you’re conveniently ignoring the things I say that make your points invalid.

But your strawman is already debunked by things I previously said.

What I’m proposing gives no one any “power” because I never proposed a change in the legal system. I said that people should believe the victims, and you’re transforming that (completely in good faith, I’m suuure) into “the legal system should condemn anyone who ever gets accused by anyone of rape”.

You’re showing more and more that you’re arguing in bad faith, your arguments are weaker and weaker (I mean, you didn’t even really have any in this message), so at this point it’s seeming like you’re just feeling personally attacked. So either you’re so brainwashed by some shithole like 4chan or whatever that you feel attacked by things that don’t concern you, or they do concern you. Either way, I’m not going to waste more time, you’ve shown enough of your cards for anyone to know who you are, I’m not going to inflict myself more of your presence.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come Mark Wahlberg got a pass for being the crap out of a Vietnamese guy. But Kevin Spacey, Bill Cosby, Weinstein, do not get a pass? Beside the sexual aspect what is the difference?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Yeah because if you, as an individual, believe that someone is a rapist, they go to jail.

Genius.

You must be a second account of someone I debunked before, it’s not possible that you would just spit out the same exact shit.

Did you get banned and made a new account?
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come Mark Wahlberg got a pass for being the crap out of a Vietnamese guy. But Kevin Spacey, Bill Cosby, Weinstein, do not get a pass? Beside the sexual aspect what is the difference?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Wow, rapist supporters always have this shitty “argument” that never works. Are you so scared of being accused of rape?

Anyways, this doesn’t work because there is a pretty big amount of reasons to not believe you here (duh). And in the case someone accused me seriously and credibly of rape, then yeah, I would expect people who don’t have evidence pointing one way or another to believe the victim. Sorry, you might be used to your sense of selfishness altering your moral beliefs but it doesn’t work here.

Also, even if I were a rapist as you said, it would not bear any weight in my argument that victims should be believed. If anything, if even rapists were saying that, it would just prove my point even more.

You’re just using the same pathetic attack that everyone who tries to defend rapists ends up using. Are you all brainwashed clones, or just one guy with a lot of fake accounts?

And nice link, but

There’s a big stretch between claiming on a case by case basis that justice has been miscarried, and making a flat out statement that […] victims shouldn’t be believed a priori. I guess your rules only apply on others, once again your moral stances seem to shift with the wind.

20 accusers is a form of evidence, but not 1 accuser? Then how many is evidence, two? Three? And according to your argument, evidence doesn’t matter since what matters is innocence until proof of guilt, which implies being judged and condemned. Unless you consider that you have the authority to decide who is guilty and who isn’t, and then your whole initial point doesn’t exist.

Of course you believe your family, but why? Because families never lie? No, it’s just that you respect your family and you understand that claiming to having been raped is a challenge on its own. Yet you consider that if a stranger does it, they’re lying unless they can prove it. That’s called being a self-centered jerk.

In the case of an opposition between two unbalanced sides, not deciding is siding with the more powerful side. If you see a nazi in the street beating up a black guy, and you think “I’m not going to take a decision because maybe the black guy started the fight, I don’t have enough information to defend either side”, you’re not neutral, you’re a nazi supporter. Same if you hear a black guy say that he’s been beaten up by a nazi without proof of it, and you decide to stay “neutral”. Once again, that’s a stance that is known to be wrong and to favour the oppressors.

I really need to just write a book that debunks the stupid pro-rapists arguments and send it to all of your group whenever you send a comment, I’m sick of having to write the same things every few months because you and your clones are so scared that someone would accuse you of rape or something. Always the same bullshit over and over, the “you are a rapist. Now prove that you’re not” sentence written almost word by word, all that crap that even a 10 years old would be able to debunk but that for some reason resonates in all the rapists defenders.

What goes through your mind, really? “But what if people say that I raped them”? Because I never felt threatened by that, but maybe that’s because I know that I never raped anyone.
⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How come Mark Wahlberg got a pass for being the crap out of a Vietnamese guy. But Kevin Spacey, Bill Cosby, Weinstein, do not get a pass? Beside the sexual aspect what is the difference?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
Justice is generally not carried at all for rape accusations, cases are not even recorded and cops tell victims “I would have done the same, shut up slut”.

I am also not saying that all accused rapists are guilty, but that you should believe the victims unless you have strong evidence of the opposite. Just like you should believe victims of discriminations that explain it to you, instead of saying “I don’t see it so it doesn’t exist”. The concept is the same, you side with the side that is being treated unfairly, not the opposite.

How many cases of rape accusations do you know, that seem fake, compared to how many seem justified, and how many of those end up with the perpetrator condemned (or even judged)?

Believing victims doesn’t bring anything bad, it just gives you a mindset that allows you to see further than the rape culture that society is drowned in. And when someone is accused by 20 people of rape, instead of immediately thinking “these 20 people are greedy liars that are just preying on this poor, innocent celebrity”, you start wondering how you can get 20 people to go through the humiliation of declaring themselves victims of rape, which is seen as shameful (for some reason), without having done anything wrong.

And also, ask women (not only, but statistically it’s a sad fact) around you if they’ve ever been assaulted, raped, or whatnot. Even though most probably wouldn’t want to tell you, statistically I guarantee that a bunch of them went through something like that and never talked about it. Your reaction is typically why, they know that without hard proof (which generally doesn’t exist) people will immediately believe the assaulter instead. And according to your stance, if your mother tells you she’s been assaulted 30 years ago, your answer would be “Do you have proof? Why have you waited for so long? Is the perpetrator famous?”. But of course you wouldn’t react like that, because once it’s someone that you know and respect (I mean, I don’t know your relationship with your mother), you realize how hard it is for them to go through that, and that even talking about it is a big sacrifice.

So basically: if you don’t believe the victims by default, then you believe the rapists by default. And society already defends the rapists. So yeah, I’m not going to wait for a court to give their judgement to have an opinion, and without any strong evidence that the victim would be lying (which basically never happens), I’m going to side with them.