thedeadwalking4242
@thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
- Comment on The Future is Now! 4 hours ago:
This is 100% ai
- Comment on School of hard knocks 6 days ago:
Although this is stupid you wouldn’t believe the amount of people I work with who are “highly educated” who just have the worst work process / ideas / work ethic.
The past two years of my life working in corporate has dramatically changed my overall views on average human intelligence.
- Comment on Real 1 week ago:
Bro that’s a PRIME sailing planet if I’ve ever seen on.
Earths oceans shores are largely extremely boring linear beaches. Especially along the Atlantic.
This plant would be prime for small cheap hobby costal sailing
- Comment on we're cooked 1 week ago:
Is he threating nuclear war???
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 2 weeks ago:
That all works until “couch pisser” is “murderer” or those “entrepreneur” types or someone who wants to be a “king”. Or is a “manipulator”
Then you have several thousand people who like the idea of having a “king” and now you have a hierarchy.
Irrational people are more numerous then you think.
And a group that does decided a member isn’t welcome anymore is a hierarchy. It doesn’t require you to be exploiting the person at the bottom. I’ll be it a fairly flat one but hey.
My example is extremely simple and that’s on purpose. my point is you will never be able to get enough people to form little in groups where they all work together because without incentive people will just do whatever the hell they want and that small group of people can disproportionately affect the larger whole even if they are playing by your rules.
Anarchism works in small groups. But it falls apart as you scale up, by nature of the limited resources of our world some order must be kept or things will slide into chaos. Some amorphous blob of a group isn’t going to be able to do that.
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 2 weeks ago:
So yes. You and your flat mates have now formed a hierarchy lol you and your flat mates on the top. Couch pisser on the bottom. It’s an obtuse example but I think it reflects reality.
Your example of “I want to deport every brown person” is an perfect example of a real life couch pisser lol.
People will decide to enact their will onto others based on their personal morals. If enough people come together with the same morals they will as a group decide to form a hierarchy.
It’s like if you dispersed a bunch of dust into space evenly. It’ll start to clump eventually.
Any system that effectively minimize the ability for one will to destabilize the group as a whole is probably best.
Anarchism just isn’t that. Its like the libertarian version of leftist policy.
Structure must exist because not everyone’s wants to play fairly and not everyone needs to be worrying about that.
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 2 weeks ago:
What if one your flat mates decided to start pissing on the couch instead of the toilet lol are you going to do
- Call the police
- Sue him
- Kick him out with the rest of your flat mates
- Talk to him and hope he stops
- Leave yourself
- Call a mental health clinic
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 2 weeks ago:
"Anarchy is a form of society without rulers. As a type of stateless society, it is commonly contrasted with states, which are polities that claim a monopoly on violence over a permanent territory. Beyond a lack of government, it can more precisely refer to societies that lack any form of authority or hierarchy. While viewed positively by anarchists, the primary advocates of anarchy, it is viewed negatively by advocates of statism, who see it in terms of social disorder. "
I’m going to be honest, and maybe it’s a difference in personal experience. But I can’t even count my fingers and toes the amount of people I personally know who would immediately take advantage of that situation.
Anarchism relies on everyone playing by the rules. We already live in a state with a monopoly on violence and we still can’t get everyone to play by the rules .
My main argument against anarchy as a large scale societal system is that nearly immediately bands and kingdoms would begin to form.
Humans existed in the natural order for many millions of years before modern society. Even then they adopted district forms of hierarchy again and again. It won’t take long before someone tries to make themselves a king and fuck over everyone else.
I want to be clear though I believe the ideal form of government is not even close to any of the gov we have around today. So I don’t want to be seen as arguing for the bullshit we are currently doing lol.
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 2 weeks ago:
But that’s the thing, they aren’t anarchist. All of those groups you describe end up either having a power structure appointed by someone else or created by the group.
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 2 weeks ago:
Your right, they don’t have any solutions. Not all ideas are good ideas even if given a name.
Anarchism by its nature cannot work, and anything to mitigate its faults just adds some form of democratic power system, which IMO is not anarchism it’s something else.
- Comment on where? 3 weeks ago:
I’m sitting next to house because if I don’t bother him he’ll probably pop a couple vicoden and take a shot and sleep
- Comment on great grandaddy bur oak 4 weeks ago:
Incredibly. Even very closely related organisms can have a hard time breeding
- Comment on Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash 5 weeks ago:
Because in my personal experience through use 25% doesn’t seem quite right.
Besides these companies have a monetary incentive to ensure LLMs show high numbers on these tests. One of the most widely use tests (bench verified) is itself a currated selection of problems. In real world usage the failure rate is going to be much higher.
A rational person trust but verifies, and at least for me the verification doesn’t hold up to even a tiny bit of scrutiny so having doubts is a perfectly healthy thing to do.
Just because someone disagrees with with a data source does not make them irrational. There are some extremely well verified truths that are irrational to dismiss but not all data sources / studies have had that amount of rigor applied against them. Data can tell a story, but it doesn’t always tell the whole truth. People manipulate data to their own benifit.
People confuse the scientific method and academic research for “this one academic source says this it must be true” when really you need more then that.
- Comment on Nuclear energy enjoyers vindicated again after the rise in oil and gas prices. 5 weeks ago:
Keep in mind significant effort was put into ensure Chernobyl didn’t experience further thermal detonation. It could get a lot worse. Especially with bigger reactors.
All being said there are safer reactor types but do you really trust the same people who put doge in charge with getting that implemented correctly so it doesn’t explode? Especially with the increased interest in small scale reactors that would be much closer to people.
- Comment on Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash 5 weeks ago:
I’m honestly sure the failure rate is higher then 25% those test they boat about are currated.
- Comment on Nuclear energy enjoyers vindicated again after the rise in oil and gas prices. 5 weeks ago:
Nuclear is the lesser evil. But I think we should be clear that nuclear can Have a catastrophic effect on the environment if manged incorrectly. Like render entire swaths of earth inhabitable. Like beyond high temperature. Places that mean immediate silent death
But properly managed nuclear is like the greatest thing to ever happen to humanity.
But I will say in light of recent… Events, my faith that humanity could properly manage our waste if nuclear were to become more prolific has wained dramatically.
- Comment on Why are people like my grandpa so against seeing the whole world and learning a different language? 5 weeks ago:
He’s probably racist and it has to do with his politics
- Comment on Fascism bad. 5 weeks ago:
Honestly is more surprising any human is relatively rational. We are animals after all. I’m starting to realize thinking deeply about anything might be the exception not the rule. Most people are idiots
- Comment on Avocado. Is it really so untasty or I am doing something wrong? 5 weeks ago:
It’s good with salt some oil and some bread. You’re right. It is better with other things rather then raw. You can also make them into a great dip for corn chips
- Comment on bold words 1 month ago:
Run
- Comment on Can a reasonable person genuinely believe in ghosts? 1 month ago:
No. It’s unreasonable. Tell your friend that I specifically said he’s a twat
- Comment on Westerners, what's your impression on the Chinese Diaspora? And what does the people around your area of residence think of the Chinese Diaspora? 1 month ago:
At least for me, a lot of them I encountered are wealthy and were opposed to the current government and sought escape.
They seem to believe in US exceptionalism.
Most I meet seem privileged and detached.
From the ones who aren’t fell wealthy families they are just like everyone else generally very kind and polite.
- Comment on Sleep well 1 month ago:
AI shit like this is especially uncanny because it seems to have extra depth that’s impossible normally in the medium.
Very freaky feels like a dream and kinda hurts my eyes
- Comment on Modern suggested serving size 2 months ago:
I could only find one place in a 50mi radius that was and they closed recently
- Comment on Hey Micro$haft, how's it going? 2 months ago:
Why couldn’t this have happened while I was working 😭
- Comment on Such a dreamy guy 2 months ago:
JOhio
- Comment on Why does everyone here think they're autistic or ADHD? The memes all describe normal human foibles. 3 months ago:
Capitalism and consumer culture expects as all to be robots. Autism and ADHD labels help people feel more comfortable excusing their humans behavior so they self assign. Also because more people are ADHD and autistic so a mix
- Comment on If God (or any creator of the universe) exists would he be made out of atoms? 3 months ago:
If any “god” exists then everything goes out the window. Anything can happen. Could be atoms could not kinda their choice I guess.
- Comment on Check mate, atheists. 3 months ago:
Usually the response I get is
“Actually there’s historical fact that jesus was alive and there was a flood and that the earth is 5000s year old and there’s a firmament. Scientific fact! 🤓👆”
Drives me insane. Even the reasonable Christians eat this shit up.
- Comment on I just 💚 them and think they're neat. 4 months ago:
It uses the chloroplast as the algae uses them. It doesn’t really it them it uses them to photosynthesize. If you took the wing off the chicken and used it to fly you could say that was stealing its wing