thedeadwalking4242
@thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
- Comment on 👴☝️I did that 1 day ago:
There’s definitely location on earth where they will get generate again. Plus climate change only really means the extinction of all human life as we know it. Everything else will carry on, it’s not the first large level extinction event.
The conditions that created it are likely to arise again. Most oil deposits are actually from innumerable numbers of planktonic life that built up on the ocean floor. Coal is from plant matter though.
Point is its generally easier to redirect then reprogram people, with enough nudges they’ll start to see they are being lied to, or at least will know not to bother you with that specific subject anymore
- Comment on 👴☝️I did that 2 days ago:
It will! Just not within human life spans that’s my answer usually. Alot of their thoughts are grounded in something real. Its easier then telling them they are flat out wrong usually.
Unless it’s the flat earthers
- Comment on They just made the winning bid 2 days ago:
It’s more like “meets” requirements
And usually it’s specifically functional requirements. Unless it was spelled out, it was considered and or was designed out / shitty to save cash
- Comment on 👴☝️I did that 2 days ago:
Gas is a cheat code to decades of stored solar energy. It won’t be cheap for ever. Once you mine up all that shit it’s gone.
Look at WV and their coal. Use to have 12 ft coal seams. Now all that’s left are hard to reach low quality 1-2ft seams. At some point it’s not even worth the energy to extract.
- Comment on We produce more resources than we could ever consume in the least sustainable ways possible. 1 week ago:
Yeah exactly I’m not sure if this person has ever looked at a map before but we use alot of land not just for habitation, even if we halved the size of every farm its just not it
- Comment on We produce more resources than we could ever consume in the least sustainable ways possible. 1 week ago:
Over population is a problem just because we occupy 10% of the land doesn’t mean we should double it to 20%? Do you know how much of the earths biosphere that would continue to chew into? Even if we farm more efficiently it doesn’t mean there should be more of us shitting around
- Comment on systemd 3 weeks ago:
Replace everything is a file with “everything is a byte stream with a file handle” and your there.
There is A LOT of Unix that doesn’t stick to the convention of “everything is a text file” and for good reason.
- Comment on Given dogs' propensity for sniffing other animals' buttholes and piles of other animals' shit, do their noses and sinuses have specialised bacteria/antibodies that protect them infection? 3 weeks ago:
They still get sick, just like people will, maybe a bit less so
- Comment on Your grammar lesson for today 3 weeks ago:
What about “very huge”
- Comment on Real 3 weeks ago:
I’m learning Portuguese rn and the middle one is real
- Comment on Theories on Theories 5 weeks ago:
“why do you guys do it that way”
“Look because if we don’t sacrifice the goat on Thursday the code breaks, idk what to tell you”
- Comment on Innovation 5 weeks ago:
I actually really like this, and it won’t slide down your wrist or hug it too tight either
- Comment on Not to get into a debate. If God is so omnipotent and above humans why does he or she have emotions? Like smiting or being upset or wrath? 1 month ago:
It’s all fictional, it can be whatever you want
- Comment on The Future is Now! 1 month ago:
This is 100% ai
- Comment on School of hard knocks 1 month ago:
Although this is stupid you wouldn’t believe the amount of people I work with who are “highly educated” who just have the worst work process / ideas / work ethic.
The past two years of my life working in corporate has dramatically changed my overall views on average human intelligence.
- Comment on Real 1 month ago:
Bro that’s a PRIME sailing planet if I’ve ever seen on.
Earths oceans shores are largely extremely boring linear beaches. Especially along the Atlantic.
This plant would be prime for small cheap hobby costal sailing
- Comment on we're cooked 1 month ago:
Is he threating nuclear war???
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 1 month ago:
That all works until “couch pisser” is “murderer” or those “entrepreneur” types or someone who wants to be a “king”. Or is a “manipulator”
Then you have several thousand people who like the idea of having a “king” and now you have a hierarchy.
Irrational people are more numerous then you think.
And a group that does decided a member isn’t welcome anymore is a hierarchy. It doesn’t require you to be exploiting the person at the bottom. I’ll be it a fairly flat one but hey.
My example is extremely simple and that’s on purpose. my point is you will never be able to get enough people to form little in groups where they all work together because without incentive people will just do whatever the hell they want and that small group of people can disproportionately affect the larger whole even if they are playing by your rules.
Anarchism works in small groups. But it falls apart as you scale up, by nature of the limited resources of our world some order must be kept or things will slide into chaos. Some amorphous blob of a group isn’t going to be able to do that.
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 1 month ago:
So yes. You and your flat mates have now formed a hierarchy lol you and your flat mates on the top. Couch pisser on the bottom. It’s an obtuse example but I think it reflects reality.
Your example of “I want to deport every brown person” is an perfect example of a real life couch pisser lol.
People will decide to enact their will onto others based on their personal morals. If enough people come together with the same morals they will as a group decide to form a hierarchy.
It’s like if you dispersed a bunch of dust into space evenly. It’ll start to clump eventually.
Any system that effectively minimize the ability for one will to destabilize the group as a whole is probably best.
Anarchism just isn’t that. Its like the libertarian version of leftist policy.
Structure must exist because not everyone’s wants to play fairly and not everyone needs to be worrying about that.
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 1 month ago:
What if one your flat mates decided to start pissing on the couch instead of the toilet lol are you going to do
- Call the police
- Sue him
- Kick him out with the rest of your flat mates
- Talk to him and hope he stops
- Leave yourself
- Call a mental health clinic
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 1 month ago:
"Anarchy is a form of society without rulers. As a type of stateless society, it is commonly contrasted with states, which are polities that claim a monopoly on violence over a permanent territory. Beyond a lack of government, it can more precisely refer to societies that lack any form of authority or hierarchy. While viewed positively by anarchists, the primary advocates of anarchy, it is viewed negatively by advocates of statism, who see it in terms of social disorder. "
I’m going to be honest, and maybe it’s a difference in personal experience. But I can’t even count my fingers and toes the amount of people I personally know who would immediately take advantage of that situation.
Anarchism relies on everyone playing by the rules. We already live in a state with a monopoly on violence and we still can’t get everyone to play by the rules .
My main argument against anarchy as a large scale societal system is that nearly immediately bands and kingdoms would begin to form.
Humans existed in the natural order for many millions of years before modern society. Even then they adopted district forms of hierarchy again and again. It won’t take long before someone tries to make themselves a king and fuck over everyone else.
I want to be clear though I believe the ideal form of government is not even close to any of the gov we have around today. So I don’t want to be seen as arguing for the bullshit we are currently doing lol.
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 2 months ago:
But that’s the thing, they aren’t anarchist. All of those groups you describe end up either having a power structure appointed by someone else or created by the group.
- Comment on How would an anarchist society work? 2 months ago:
Your right, they don’t have any solutions. Not all ideas are good ideas even if given a name.
Anarchism by its nature cannot work, and anything to mitigate its faults just adds some form of democratic power system, which IMO is not anarchism it’s something else.
- Comment on where? 2 months ago:
I’m sitting next to house because if I don’t bother him he’ll probably pop a couple vicoden and take a shot and sleep
- Comment on great grandaddy bur oak 2 months ago:
Incredibly. Even very closely related organisms can have a hard time breeding
- Comment on Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash 2 months ago:
Because in my personal experience through use 25% doesn’t seem quite right.
Besides these companies have a monetary incentive to ensure LLMs show high numbers on these tests. One of the most widely use tests (bench verified) is itself a currated selection of problems. In real world usage the failure rate is going to be much higher.
A rational person trust but verifies, and at least for me the verification doesn’t hold up to even a tiny bit of scrutiny so having doubts is a perfectly healthy thing to do.
Just because someone disagrees with with a data source does not make them irrational. There are some extremely well verified truths that are irrational to dismiss but not all data sources / studies have had that amount of rigor applied against them. Data can tell a story, but it doesn’t always tell the whole truth. People manipulate data to their own benifit.
People confuse the scientific method and academic research for “this one academic source says this it must be true” when really you need more then that.
- Comment on Nuclear energy enjoyers vindicated again after the rise in oil and gas prices. 2 months ago:
Keep in mind significant effort was put into ensure Chernobyl didn’t experience further thermal detonation. It could get a lot worse. Especially with bigger reactors.
All being said there are safer reactor types but do you really trust the same people who put doge in charge with getting that implemented correctly so it doesn’t explode? Especially with the increased interest in small scale reactors that would be much closer to people.
- Comment on Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash 2 months ago:
I’m honestly sure the failure rate is higher then 25% those test they boat about are currated.
- Comment on Nuclear energy enjoyers vindicated again after the rise in oil and gas prices. 2 months ago:
Nuclear is the lesser evil. But I think we should be clear that nuclear can Have a catastrophic effect on the environment if manged incorrectly. Like render entire swaths of earth inhabitable. Like beyond high temperature. Places that mean immediate silent death
But properly managed nuclear is like the greatest thing to ever happen to humanity.
But I will say in light of recent… Events, my faith that humanity could properly manage our waste if nuclear were to become more prolific has wained dramatically.
- Comment on Why are people like my grandpa so against seeing the whole world and learning a different language? 2 months ago:
He’s probably racist and it has to do with his politics