inclementimmigrant
@inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
- Disney may be interested in acquiring Epic Games at some point, it’s claimedwww.videogameschronicle.com ↗Submitted 15 hours ago to games@lemmy.world | 38 comments
- Comment on What was the worst movie to game adapation you've played? 15 hours ago:
NES, Back to the future. That was a video game rental that wasted a whole weekend but at least it was just a rental.
- Submitted 3 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 14 comments
- Submitted 3 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 2 comments
- Developer of cozy tea shop adventure Wanderstop is shutting down: 'It's a particularly tough time for raising game funds'www.pcgamer.com ↗Submitted 3 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 5 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 19 comments
- Comment on Owlcat is using generative AI for The Expanse Osiris Reborn, but the final game will be "100% human made" 4 days ago:
That’s the fun part of all of it though, there’s no definition or even subjective ruling of what constitutes “substantial transformation” or any running that generative AI being derivative of copyrighted material, it’s a complete legal clusterfuck of law and consequences.
But yeah, I do agree that if a running or law change came about it would definitely be in the favor of late stage capitalism.
- Comment on Owlcat is using generative AI for The Expanse Osiris Reborn, but the final game will be "100% human made" 4 days ago:
- Comment on Owlcat is using generative AI for The Expanse Osiris Reborn, but the final game will be "100% human made" 4 days ago:
Upside, so if these guys use AI to create assets or code, none of that can be copyrighted currently under the law. Therefore if it’s not copyrightable then pirating the game and using those assets in other games is perfectly fine.
- Owlcat is using generative AI for The Expanse Osiris Reborn, but the final game will be "100% human made"www.pcgamesn.com ↗Submitted 4 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 104 comments
- Kadokawa’s activist shareholder Oasis Management raises stake to 11.85%, exceeding Sony’sautomaton-media.com ↗Submitted 5 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 0 comments
- Submitted 5 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 3 comments
- Submitted 6 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 29 comments
- Epic CEO Tim Sweeney says 'employers will see a stream of resumes of once-in-a-lifetime quality' after the company laid off more than 1,000 peoplewww.pcgamer.com ↗Submitted 6 days ago to games@lemmy.world | 129 comments
- Bethesda has no plans to slow down on paid mods, Todd Howard says he wants to get Creations 'in front of more people'www.tweaktown.com ↗Submitted 1 week ago to games@lemmy.world | 20 comments
- Comment on Nvidia CEO Says He Gets Where The DLSS 5 Outrage Is Coming From: ‘I Don’t Love AI Slop Myself’ 1 week ago:
I think it would be more like I super glued a horrible facemask on top of your face there but I didn’t touch your underlying facial bones. But hey I allowed the developer to at least adjust what parts of your face I won’t put a horrible sticker on.
- Nvidia CEO Says He Gets Where The DLSS 5 Outrage Is Coming From: ‘I Don’t Love AI Slop Myself’kotaku.com ↗Submitted 1 week ago to games@lemmy.world | 45 comments
- Capcom says it 'will not implement assets generated by AI into our game content,' but still plans to use AI to 'enhance efficiency and boost productivity' in game developmentwww.pcgamer.com ↗Submitted 1 week ago to games@lemmy.world | 15 comments
- Comment on Crimson Desert Surpasses 2 Million Sales, Fixes And Improvements Planned 1 week ago:
Honestly from the reviews, for me it’s a patient gamer listing.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
Thankfully there are plenty of developers that haven’t drank the AI Kool aid and are still cranking out great games that have artistic integrity that didn’t require even a single 5090.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
Dude is just being a obtuse troll. Just block and move on.
- Comment on Nvidia Answers my DLSS 5 Questions - Daniel Owen 1 week ago:
I think to your second point, since this AI Instagram filter is based on a 2D picture with no understanding of the light source or materials, even the background with this tech will ruin things.
One of the things I said in another post is that the DLSS demo with Grace was that I wasn’t just thrown by the face, I honestly was also thrown by the brightly lit background that really undermined what that scene was trying to convey.
To me the original scene was somber, she’s visiting a murder scene, the background amplifies that somber time with everything darker, shadows everywhere threatening to consume the light. The DLSS 5 scene, everything is brighter, shinier and now that same scene isn’t helping to convey the getting atmosphere, it’s like the darkness is being overcome.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
So figured I wouldn’t give this attention seeker any more attention but I find it funny this poster shushed you about adults taking when it looks like they abandoned the discussion they were having with me about generative AI vs modding in a heavily downvoted thread, hence the whole agreeing with the previous poster thing.
Guess this guy didn’t want a adult discussion.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
Just a reminder that the GTA trilogy was the shining example the last time people used AI to remaster an old game.
- Comment on Nvidia Answers my DLSS 5 Questions - Daniel Owen 1 week ago:
Maybe? But considering that it’s a 2D image with no underlying information about the models it would probably put light on things that shouldn’t be lit up, actually detracting from what it should look like.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
Yeah, I’m definitely and idiot for thinking you had actual coherent thought.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
Again, the key distinction to me is that a human had the idea and created it not fucking AI, not a mishmash other artists styles and ideas, it’s a unique individual’s idea and style that is ultimately produced.
If you use AI as the main creator then you’ve lost control of artistic vision because it’s not yours anymore. There’s a fine line between using a tool to help you get to something and stealing another person’s idea.
So let’s go with you Shrek analogy. At some point a human created Shrek as a unique idea and made it come to life. Now you want to use Shrek as in mod as a NPC, at that point my view is you’ve got no actual creative artistic intent there, you’re just using another humans idea but at some point at least it was a humans unique idea and if you had no idea how to make that into a 3d model to incorporate into your game then AI tools could help you make a Shrek model. I won’t call it AI slop completely but I’d definitely call it uninspired garbage and a complete theft of another persons idea without adding anything of substance but at least I could understand that you liked Shrek and wanted Shrek in your game, original game designer be damned I want Shrek all the time. And again, with mods, I’m free to never, ever install your mod.
To me human intent and choice is the biggest difference even with your analogy you would at least you would understand what the artists intent for the game was and made the conscious decision that Shrek would be better suited in the game and not generative AI going in and simply replacing everyone’s face with Shrek because a model stated Shrek’s face was what the model’s if/else statements averaged out between a whole set of pictures faces.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
No I’m a human that can at least understand my own argument.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
Irrelevant to you point? Damn, so you don’t even understand your own argument then.
Your first line is literally this:
It’s astonishing to me that PC gamers are suddenly so focused on the “creative intent” of game visuals
and then you’re the one who starts equating mods and how they’ve been altering “creative intent” and implying DLSS 5’s generative AI is no different.
The whole argument about this tech is ALL about creative intent when DLSS is not understanding the game and forcing an algorithmic take on the creative intent not just about how bad it looks.
Fuck man, get your shit in order with a coherent stance and argument.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
If you want to us AI as the too to help you make dream a reality, there are plenty there for modeling and helping to make textures, that’s fine.
If you want generative AI to make you just make you model based on someone else’s art work, then to me as part of my values and morality, No. At that point you’ve lost any point of artistic intent when you’re letting AI, using other people’s design, other people’s artistic intent and style to make something for you. It’s not your art, your artistic intent you’re sharing at that point.
Also, even if you did do that, I as a gamer would still have the option to never use your AI slop of a mod, which is the other part of my argument on why mods are different from DLSS 5.