yarr
@yarr@feddit.nl
- Comment on [deleted] 5 days ago:
Closed source browsers are rare today, and even those are built on the open source browser cores.
Any browser that’s not Chrome is rare today. I’m not sure pointing at Chrome as a well-managed open source project is a good idea. Although one can view the source, Google controls the codebase and development process with an iron hand. Any feature that is a good idea technically, but will hurt Google is a no-go to have merged.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 days ago:
Yes. Open standards always win, given time. No one keeps paying for a closed standard, once the open (free!) one is just as good.
Like Gimp? Oh, wait that didn’t take over. Well, at least Libreoffice is the standard office suite today, oh wait, that didn’t take over. Well, Linux is the most used operating system at least. Whoops, except Android counts as that and it’s increasingly locked down.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 days ago:
Is there anything, ever, that’s trended towards more open?
- Comment on 7 for me 2 weeks ago:
I’ve never had vaseline on a windshield on a foggy day, just on an overcast one. You’d have to try it yourself.
- Comment on 7 for me 2 weeks ago:
Was this meme part of a contest to see how destroyed you can make a meme by JPEG compression artifacts? I’ve seen clearer images looking through a windshield smeared in vaseline on a cloudy day.
- Comment on Why Do Sovereign Citizens Keep Pursuing Unsuccessful Legal Defenses? 3 weeks ago:
Another “sovcit victory”
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
Well duh, just open up a factory in your garage.
- Comment on Why Do Sovereign Citizens Keep Pursuing Unsuccessful Legal Defenses? 3 weeks ago:
I’m not saying keep them out of courts. I’m saying that the followers of “sovereign citizenry” seem to lose 100% of the court cases where they try this defense. Yet, there’s a continuous stream of people willing to try it.
- Submitted 3 weeks ago to [deleted] | 43 comments
- Comment on The clueless people are out there among us 3 weeks ago:
At least they knew it was going to sound stupid.
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 4 weeks ago:
I had a pair of grandparents old enough to be involved in factory work and they had hated it. They both educated themselves to a degree where they could get a better job and get out of the factories. It seems odd enough that we’d aspire to go back to these times.
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 4 weeks ago:
Not sure if this will convince you or not
I don’t think I worded my original post properly because I feel convinced already. I was just looking for a way to measure up the effects of this idea. If we are a country dependent on importing goods and we make them more expensive, it stands to reason that we either stop getting those goods (doesn’t seem easy…) OR we just deal with the price, and that doesn’t seem easy either.
I just thought this is odd… like if I wanted to propose a tax on bicycles, we could talk how many bicycles there are in the USA, if this would make sense, etc. but that’s an actual discussion. Most of the people in this thread are just asserting it’s a bad idea and either don’t know the “why” themselves, or just don’t want to say.
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 5 weeks ago:
For the factory workers in the industrial heartland it will be good.
So we should expect to see more manufacturing jobs? How long will they take to show up? What kind of products will they build?
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 5 weeks ago:
Thanks for putting some numbers on it. A lot of people are just downvoting and saying “well it’s bad!”. I want to know why and I think some of those numbers above really help to quantify it. Collecting 0.8% doesn’t seem very effective, so if someone tried to defend this as a replacement for Income tax, I would say that gets an F.
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 5 weeks ago:
We already know. We already know they’re bad.
I don’t find that a convincing argument. If this is such an economy ending thing, certainly you could say “Well, just look at X!” and it would be really bad. There should be some chart showing good before and bad after. Where’s that chart?
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 5 weeks ago:
Trump is supposed to be in office for only 4 years, at best, after which his tariffs will go away. it would be easier to simply just not ship to the US. which is how trade partners responded to the Hawley-Smoot Act in 1930, and which made the Great Depression that much harder to get out of.
Yes, I think this is very wise. So, unless we are just saying “well, I guess this 3.7 years is a loss now…” that’s the end.
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 5 weeks ago:
If they worked, we would see manufacturers almost instantly beginning construction on US factories, opening new ones and reopening shuttered plants.
I think the almost instantly is the problem there for me. If I was someone that could afford to build a factory, I know that it would take a couple of years to come up to speed. I also know that if the tariffs disappear, that my money is gone. It won’t work under “normal” conditions. So, I’ll want some assurance these will be in place for a while. Since no one will make that assurance, or at least someone who would would be lying, I wouldn’t feel confident enough to build anything.
I assume anyone with enough money to build a factory would think about some variation of that above. I think for that reason, no serious numbers of factories will get built. And, if none get built… what are we doing?
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 5 weeks ago:
Well, this is what I want to know. If someone wanted to open the door in the winter, I could take the temperature and say “It was 20F in our house last night. That wasn’t a good idea.” What do you measure here? What’s the long answer?
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 5 weeks ago:
Will we listen? No, because experts don’t count for shit in the US anymore.
You know, in a world where most people don’t listen to experts and follow data, there’s a lot of money to be made in just doing your research. It seems like over time the people and places that learn to use data to guide their hand will outperform the ones of those that do not.
I guess we will see which one is a winning strategy.
- Comment on How Will We Know If The Trump Tariffs Were A Good Idea? 5 weeks ago:
I don’t think it’s a good idea. I just want to know if the badness of the idea can be quantified. Otherwise there’s the chance that in the future, someone decides to do it again.
- Submitted 5 weeks ago to [deleted] | 53 comments
- Comment on Are we all suffering from "future shock" in 2025? 5 weeks ago:
Hacked it!
- Comment on Are we all suffering from "future shock" in 2025? 5 weeks ago:
EDIT: not sure what I said that was so controversial as to being deserving of downvotes.
I try to never just slam that button instead of replying, because then we all lose out on learning a bit more. When I read your comment, especially the bit:
Of course if you only scroll the news you’ll feel depressed because we live in a dystopia, but that’s not information overload, it’s just sad. On the other hand if simply reading anything makes you overwhelmed that just seems like a lack of reading stamina so you can just not do that, or develop that stamina.
That feels a lot like telling someone depressed: “Hey idiot, ever thought of just not being sad?” I think the really tragic point is there are some people extremely addicted to doom-scrolling, despite feeling awfully sad about it. Classical addiction.
And then, some other gems, like:
Transient relationships: He warned about shallow, fleeting social connections — something social media, dating apps, and global mobility have absolutely amplified. I don’t think this is a bad thing.
This feels profoundly against human nature. We seem predisposed, almost since birth, to try to form deep, lasting relationships with other people. You might feel this way but I’m not sure it’s a typical state.
Job instability: He nailed the rise of the gig economy, freelancing, and how fast-changing industries make it hard to stay trained up and secure. This is all basic capitalism and it’s consequences.
But it’s not though… capitalism is hundreds of years old, yet the gig economy is not. If it’s just “basic capitalism” wouldn’t we have expected to see “ye Olde Ubere” workers in 1560?
- Comment on Getting your wish 5 weeks ago:
Well, one thought is that when he heard the shoddily constructed carbon fiber and titanium composite pressure hull collapsing, ALMOST CERTAINLY one of his last thoughts were “oops”. It would take some CRAZY delusion if that didn’t happen.
postscript: And yes, I know that total compression takes on the level of milliseconds at those depths… I’m just wondering if there was any creaking or “pops” like had happened on earlier dives.
- Comment on Are we all suffering from "future shock" in 2025? 5 weeks ago:
Hmm, that’s an interesting one. As a hypothetical, it feels possible to have a world that is crime free, but still has racism, so I see a possible hole. I guess another thing that will complicate it is that the definition of hate crime has evolved over the years.
- Comment on Are we all suffering from "future shock" in 2025? 5 weeks ago:
Serious question: if someone claimed deaths by smoking are up or down, there’s stats we could rely on to tell if that’s the truth or not. How do we tell the amount of racism in 2025? What statistic or statistics are indicative of racism?
- Comment on Are we all suffering from "future shock" in 2025? 5 weeks ago:
I don’t find it too hard to indicate some things that were actually better in the 1970s:
- Consumer goods and appliances were typically more reliable and designed to be repaired
- Less additives in the food supply
- Obesity was less of a problem
- College education was more affordable with an entry level job
- Children had more freedom (would roam the neighborhood for hours unsupervised)
- Less surveilance
I can make all these points without saying “1970 was better in every way than 2025”. Why does it have to be all-or-nothing? Can’t some things have been better then and not worse?
- Comment on Are we all suffering from "future shock" in 2025? 5 weeks ago:
Tho I think people from 70s would very much still choose 2025 living over 70s. People really underestimate how much better we have now.
Couldn’t I yearn for a time that has neither the bad points of 1970 and none of the bad points from 2025? Not everything was worse in the 1970s, and not everything was better, either.
- Comment on Are we all suffering from "future shock" in 2025? 5 weeks ago:
Is this similar to violent crime? A lot of right wingers bemoan the increasing amount of violence in “blue states and cities”. Except, almost by any way you can measure it, violent crime has been on the decrease for years now. Is racism becoming worse, or are you just becoming more aware of it?
- Comment on Are we all suffering from "future shock" in 2025? 5 weeks ago:
Err, did you read your own link? This wasn’t a deliberate “watermark”. It was a training error that resulted in some odd characters being inserted. This was a training defect that was fixed, not some sort of plagarism countermeasure. These marks were present for only a short time and only on a subset of OpenAI models.