teslasaur
@teslasaur@lemmy.world
- Comment on Pineapple was never the problem 1 week ago:
Why don’t you join the fun instead? Gimmie a pizza suggestion instead of this weak lambasting.
- Comment on Pineapple was never the problem 1 week ago:
That combo isn’t the appeal, it’s the curry that gets enhanced by the banana. Those two with tomato sauce and the salty peanuts are great.
Can’t say that i’ve ever tried it without cheese, so i wouldn’t even know if it was worse or not.
The combo of cheese-meat-curry-peanuts-tomato of course works without any fruit added.
- Comment on Pineapple was never the problem 1 week ago:
Fucking delicious.
I completely turned around on these recently. Most also mix in pineapple.
- Comment on Pineapple was never the problem 1 week ago:
If we’re talking pizzas that haven’t been made, but probably should.
Ham and apple. The apple should be added cold after the pizza is taken out from the oven. Never seen it done, but it should work.
- Comment on Entropy? Never heard of it. 5 weeks ago:
So power it with solar/wind?
- Comment on How did a simple phone call become so problematic? 1 month ago:
So exactly what i said?
With nuance, im talking of inflections from speech. Which you can’t get from text.
- Comment on How did a simple phone call become so problematic? 1 month ago:
Again. Insane take by someone that likely is glued to a phone 24/7.
It’s okay to not answer or answer and say, call me later.
- Comment on How did a simple phone call become so problematic? 1 month ago:
They objectively take longer. And honestly, nuance is lost in text. Especially if you rush it and dont use grammar, use abbreviations slang without context.
Text is good when you need to convey things that take a long time to find. In IT that means, ip-addresses, fqdn, configs etc. But if i need a yes or no answer, i wont be sending an email or even a dm. People have shit to do and they might be waiting for me/the response to get back to their own thing.
- Comment on How did a simple phone call become so problematic? 1 month ago:
Sounds like you need practice. How do you talk to people when you’re not on the phone?
- Comment on How did a simple phone call become so problematic? 1 month ago:
Sure, but cold calling someone is still a dick move
Thats an insane take. Especially for anyone that isn’t slave to the notification storm on a phone.
- Comment on How did a simple phone call become so problematic? 1 month ago:
Why would a call necessarily need “an answer”?. If my parents call, it’s because they want to talk like humans do.
If someone calls because they need an answer, perhaps you should answer?
Granted, i’ve noticed that people call for the most basic things nowadays, just cause they can. That’s the real issue, not calls in and of themselves. Its a skill like most other things.
- Comment on GTFO 2 months ago:
Calling it a fluke is kind of missing the point. Plants that where/are better at making use of the atmosphere as it is, will be the ones that thrive. If the atmosphere was different, different plants would exist.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
And yet they are doing so.
Not in the way the nazis did. So perhaps drop the equivalence.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Talk about missing the point.
I’m not the one you need to convice, you fucking tool. You need “the other people” to agree with you. The fact that you live in a #problematic democracy doesn’t change that you need votes.
The parallells fall apart immediately, since that happened pre-information age. Whatever the nazis did to undermine the educated is borderline impossible to do today. Whatever is happening today is different. It’s probably worse in that no information can be trusted, in comparison to no information being available at all.
Do you keep this copy-pasta to actually try to convince people?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
“right wingers” or “decent people”. Choose one, because they are mutually exclusive.
Your words. Literally. Stop labeling people.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
There you go again. Nazis. This isn’t the same. Find a new angle, because whatever is going on in the US isn’t working.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
You’re judging people based on some flaky righty-lefty dogma that attempts to put people in teams. Stop doing that, and think a bit more logically. People have a million different reasons for thinking a certain way about different subjects, and they might still be kind people. Of the top of my head, i remember the pair of guys who let Borat stay with them. They had the most insane ideas about politics that i’ve ever heard. But they let a random “immigrant” stay in their house, and didn’t utter a single word of complaint. So you’d think they are pretty tolerant. Much more tolerant than a lot of people who vote left that i’ve mer. Those are the kind people that you lose to the other side. Especially when you call them evil, or whatever you think they might be.
My gut feeling? You did lose the election. Are you not living in the same world I am? You have lost touch with what people want and prioritize.
Judge people on action, but don’t fucking label half your country as evil. Many of them have been spoonfed lies like religion since birth.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
This attitude makes liberals loose elections.
Of course there are descent people on “the right”, what would you call them if theoretically, they voted for what you want? Would they still be terrible people, just voted correctly?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Thank you!
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Would have loved to have the question answered, but instead i get a slightly sardonic and demeaning response, like I’m the idiot for not knowing. Followed by, in my opinion, a lazy response pointing to Wikipedia.
I know it takes work to keep it up to date, but that’s not the point…
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Wikipedia is probably the most trustworthy source around. It can be wrong so you should still verify it if you want to be sure.
Absolutely disagree on it being a trustworthy source, it is a collection of links to potential sources. I’m trying to verify by asking, but instead i get some lecture about how sources work. I still haven’t gotten an answer other than a Wikipedia-link, which isn’t a source. If i wanted to i could go in to the page and change the meaning to whatever i want. In a fast changing language climate, i’d like to hear what others mean by what they say. Especially since i didn’t know the term and what i thought it meant was contradictory to the meme.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Wow, it’s almost like you have trouble to make yourself understood. There are more than one that “misread” what you wrote, so perhaps some introspection is due.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
No, thats on you for formulating yourself in a shitty way.
how’s that phrase go How is that phrase go? And you talk to me about reading comprehension, when you can’t even form a coherent sentence.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Conservatives should be welcome. Everybody should be welcome.
I disagree, Nazi’s have zero place anywhere in society outside of a history book.
Insinuating that conservatives are nazis. Or misreading on purpose about what they meant by “everyone is welcome”.
Obviously nazis are shunned. But thats because their opinions are easily debunked by a normal human being. If you exclude normal people for slightly disagreeing, you end up ostracizing people that would never think “Jews are the root of all evil”, but take offense for being labeled as one.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Keep being more of a tool.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
You imply that ordinary people are nazis.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
About being condescending? Yes, you are. You showed what level you’re on by sending a Wikipedia link.
You’re like one of those troglodytes that answer a question with a lmgtfy-link unsarcastically.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
I’m asking since i was wondering what they meant by it. Have seen the word but never bothered to look it up, and instead of infering the meaning I asked.
Don’t use Wikipedia as a source if you want to come off as serious. Thats like, middle school level knowledge, at least in our schools. You still haven’t told me, and I guess that i’ll find several definitions, cause that’s usually how it goes.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Could ask you the same. You seem to imply most of all people that voted for Trump, or that agree with republicans on an issue they seem important. Hate to brake it to you, but there aren’t that many genuine nazis.