zen
@zen@lemmy.zip
- Comment on BASED? 2 days ago:
Absurdist humour 🤝 Being a trans ally
- Comment on BASED? 1 week ago:
TIL my wife is a man
- Comment on HD 137010 b 2 weeks ago:
Friday night HD 137010 b run boys, who is in?
- Comment on Can anyone explain why? 2 weeks ago:
Yes but liver disease is expensive.
- Comment on Can anyone explain why? 2 weeks ago:
Poor.
- Comment on Why do some car lovers oppose bike infrastructure, when more bikes would mean fewer cars on the road? 2 weeks ago:
Oh I see. Most of Australian cities are actually suburban and have had wider footpaths than necessary, as well as parking buffers. It’s trivially easy to just convert one side into a protected bike lane.
I still argue that in a lot of urban areas where the road has swelled to its natural limit, depending on the road, it can be good to reduce the road by one lane and add a protected bike lane. But this is situational. Not every road needs a bike lane. But there should be bike lanes every so often, so people can safely get close to their destination without bothering motorists.
It’s too much of a mental simulation to imagine how reducing car lanes becomes a benefit to those that must drive because of a reduction of traffic and potential improvement to overall flow.
Fair enough. Although reducing a road by a lane can improve congestion, it isn’t always the case, and isn’t a simple sell.
- Comment on Why do some car lovers oppose bike infrastructure, when more bikes would mean fewer cars on the road? 2 weeks ago:
They think of it as a zero-sum game
But it’s not.
The reason you need more lanes is because of a growing population using a fixed set of roadways. As you add protected bike lanes, more and more people opt for using a bicycle. This means fewer people on the road, negating the need for the extra roadway.
If you spend limited tax dollars on bike infrastructure, driving infrastructure will not receive necessary maintenance.
I’m not sure what you personally believe, but this is not true at all.
- Comment on Why do some car lovers oppose bike infrastructure, when more bikes would mean fewer cars on the road? 2 weeks ago:
I’m Australian, so maybe my experience with cyclists and cycling infrastructure is different. We usually extend our roads and have a green lane for cyclists, or even dedicated cycling ways alongside the footpath (sidewalk).
People here whinge that these protected cycle ways get built. And I’m just baffled.
- Comment on Why do some car lovers oppose bike infrastructure, when more bikes would mean fewer cars on the road? 2 weeks ago:
When car drivers are stupid they get in a small prang and have to pay the excess on someone else’s insurance.
When cyclist are stupid, they end up in a hospital or the morgue.
- Comment on Why do some car lovers oppose bike infrastructure, when more bikes would mean fewer cars on the road? 2 weeks ago:
I’m Aussie, so unfortunately it’s targeted at Australians driving huge American pickup trucks. :(
- Submitted 3 weeks ago to [deleted] | 47 comments
- Comment on Brand new bag 4 weeks ago:
THEN CALL ME A DORK
- Comment on What the fuck is this 4 weeks ago:
I’m going to tell my kids this is GMO
- Comment on Think about it 5 weeks ago:
You’re of course right. I was just being silly.
- Comment on Think about it 5 weeks ago:
But it’s not chatspeak, it’s an Assyria reference
- Comment on Be fabulous 5 weeks ago:
Chill out bro, but I agree.
- Comment on Be fabulous 5 weeks ago:
Please.
- Comment on MFW I wake up to find Lemmy feeds full of USA stuff 5 weeks ago:
How is mastodon these days?
- Comment on Mama! 5 weeks ago:
What if Sol is not our Mama, but our Pied Piper? 🎺
- Comment on 5 weeks ago:
Wet your whistle boyo
- Comment on Your name better be Caleb 5 weeks ago:
It’s okay Quinn, I’d give you a second shot :)
- Comment on AI Overview 1 month ago:
Could have been so good if you used Inspect Element to make this OP
- Comment on HP plans to save millions by laying off thousands, ramping up AI use 2 months ago:
The will save millions for a few quarters, then nose dive into oblivion. Can’t wait.
- Comment on Is it gay to have pleasurable sex with your wife? 2 months ago:
Yeah I’m really not seeing the difference. Maybe someone can explain it to me.
- Comment on A lamb amongst wolves 2 months ago:
Yes send their numbers, so we know which women to avoid
- Comment on A lamb amongst wolves 2 months ago:
I (perfect btw) don’t think this post is serious
- Comment on to whom it may concern: 3 months ago:
Because beans
- Comment on Hrmmmmm 3 months ago:
Ah, thanks for clarifying.
- Comment on Hrmmmmm 3 months ago:
When you say “renumerating” what do you mean? Do you mean remunerating, or I this some industry term that I don’t know? It isn’t in the dictionary.
- Comment on Is your job boring? This 1960s auto worker says his job was killing him 3 months ago:
Oh thank you also! It is really eye-opening. I have some additional historical context, that I learned in Business school.
Under Fordism, factory work was broken into tiny, repetitive tasks. Instead of one worker building most of a car, one might just bolt on the bumper all day. It made production faster and cheaper, but also made workers’ jobs monotonous and stripped of skill or creativity. It was then easy for each role to be replaced with automation, as technology improved.