Bennyboybumberchums
@Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
- Comment on "Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics. 2 weeks ago:
You are missing something. The ability to read. Everything is spelled out for you in the post. READ IT AGAIN. And keep reading it until you get it.
- Comment on Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anyway 2 weeks ago:
And thats why men arent allowed to some quiet time in the shed?
- Comment on MAGA, splitting hairs. 2 weeks ago:
I love it when one of the dumb cunts I mentioned comes in, to then say dumb cunt shit at me lol
Gianmarco Soresi.
Whoever the fuck that is.
No one is putting all of those under one term.
Yeah, they are. And you know they are, because we are fucking here because you dumb cunts dont like being wrong, and so just went straight to “you must be a pedo too!!!”.
Youre arguing against language being used to be accurate. If you want a blanket term, I gave you “nonce”. If you dont like that, you can have child abuser, or child rapist. Paedophile already has an exact meaning. And its not, as dumb cunts love to say, a 30 year old man dating a 25 year old.
Fucking Americans.
- Comment on MAGA, splitting hairs. 2 weeks ago:
If you were 18, and got caught having sex with your 17 year old girl/boy friend. Would you be happy to be placed into the same category of horrible human beings as Ian Watkins…?
- Comment on MAGA, splitting hairs. 2 weeks ago:
Only because online people are dumb as fuck. They cant process the nuance of basic arguments. They just want simple clickable buzzwords to like, share and subscribe. This is why we now have some of the dumbest cunts in the world claiming that 25 year old “children” cant consent…
Rape of woman, rape of a teenager, rape of a child, rape of a baby. To put these under one umbrella term is fucking weird. Its like saying “Americans voted for Trump”. Its true, but its not accurate. And Im pretty fucking sure theres a lot of Americans would take issue with that statement.
Everyone just needs to take a page out of the UK play book, and call him a fucking nonce!
- Comment on Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anyway 2 weeks ago:
Username checks out…
- Comment on Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anyway 2 weeks ago:
I suppose the most obvious example is men in sheds. It somethings that was created especially to deal with the issue of male loneliness, especially amongst the older community. Basis for being single gender, was to address those older gents who feel pressures to act a certain way around women. This was that one place they could go and just hang out doing wood working and what not. It was for men to make connections with other men, because men, seemingly, struggle with making or even keeping connections.
Enter the women, who think its sexist. Who think that men dont need just time to themselves. Theres mixed sex and single sex(female) things all over the place. But some women see men only spaces, and think “Not on my fucking watch!!!”.
Every day we talk about mens mental health, then some gaggle of cave brained cunts turns up to tell men how they have to sort their own shit out. Men in sheds did just that. Then it got popular, and then that same gaggle of cave brained cunts turns up talking about how male only spaces are toxic… Rinse, repeat, ad Infinium
www.4bc.com.au/women-are-demanding-entry-into-men… www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg5qd9l3094o
Why cant men have male on spaces? Why can we have our man caves? And if we do, why is it a a bad thing?
theguardian.com/…/members-of-londons-savile-club-…
Theres a guardian hit piece on the “disappointing” vote to have one of the last remaining gentlemans clubs remain male only. They also have a little go at “mostly white” like thats a fucking crime as well.
Same thing happened at the Flyers club. Men only for 141 years, then all of a sudden women want in and its sexist not to let them.
We cant even just play fucking video games, without getting hammered over the head about how its childish and that we need to grow up. God fucking forbid, we have a fucking hobby and some fun together.
- Comment on Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anyway 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anyway 2 weeks ago:
Women enters men only space = stunning and brave
Man enters women only space = sexist and misogynistic and low key sexual assault…
Also, online, womens only spaces are usually just as toxic as fuck as any incel space. We just dont call them what they are. So, IMO, some rules need to take a big long hard suck of societies asshole.
- Comment on Ahead of her time 2 weeks ago:
The uncanny, isnt limited to her wig. She looks like a Simpsons character made a wish on a Zoltar machine to be real person.
- Comment on Had to look this up 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Had to look this up 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Had to look this up 2 weeks ago:
No, dude. Thats one of those observations, you dim fuckwit. Honestly, your efforts here, are beyond embarrassing. You might as well be hitting back with “Im rubber, youre glue…” youre so fucking weak. Honestly, your comeback are so fucking weak, can I only assume that your parents didnt give enough of a fuck about you to bother teaching you anything. As long as youve got functional kidneys they can harvest for the child they do like, thats the only reason they keep you around.
Your comeback to this will probably be something like “haha, Im only child, stupidhead!”. Thats your level. Thats where you top out. And thats why you cant admit you were wrong. Because the weak minded are terrified of being wrong. They just hold on to shit like squirrels hold onto nuts in the winter. Your self worth, your self value is so fucking pathetic, youve jumped into this argument with false information, but refuse to admit that you got it wrong, because then youd have to part ways with your support team. All the other cave brained cunts who look for anything they can to shit on JK, instead of just focusing on what she actually says and does on the issues that you… SAY, you have an issue with.
But lets be honest, if you were to fall into a gang of racist proud boys, youd be shoving a dildo up your arse to “own the libs” right now, would ya? Thats you. Thats who you are. Or as the Jewish people would say, “Youre a shmuck.” meaning discarded penis skin after a circumcision. Except that they wouldnt say that, because thats not what it means. Thats just something the internet made up and spread around, and muppets like you repeated to the point that everyone thinks its true. Whats it like being THAT fucking stupid? Whats it like being so fucking stupid, that your sibling hopes their kidneys hold up because the idea of having any part of you inside them is terrifying in case you infect them with your stupid?
Go on, say something witty now. Something that the internet has told you is super clever… Im sure it will be worth the wait, wont it spare parts?
- Comment on Had to look this up 2 weeks ago:
If they are mean spirited, its a reason to complain. Outside that stereotypes can be anything you need them to be. They can reduce cognitive load in storytelling, or a cultural reference point to explore or subvert. Let me ask you, do you get upset at grumpy detectives? Eccentric scientists? Italians who eat family meals together? Do you attack people who make jokes about emails from Nigerians? New Yorkers being assholes, or Texans talking about stuff being bigger? Teachers who care about their students?
Stereotypes are everywhere. And we dont say anything, because we know they are just tools in writing. Or mildly entertaining gags. Theres a dude on youtube playing “Uncle Roger”, a stereotyped Chinese Malaysian. Over 10m people subbed to his channel. Are they all racist? Should we be boycotting a dude for making a funny character that shits on Jamie Oliver?
And what about subversion? When stereotypes are used to trick the audience into thinking a character is one thing, but they are really something else? Do you get offended then too?
But what about people who reenforce stereotypes? Sean Hayes might not be Jack McFarlane, but he does embody a lot of gay stereotypes. Should we all be coming with pitchforks for him? What about Graham Norton?
Or can we allow for the fact that stereotypes start in truth and grow from there? And the real issue is when we use stereotypes to cause harm? Ie, being mean spirited. You can make jokes about stereotypes, the question is are they coming from a good place? Or are they mean spirited? In the UK and Ireland, we make fun of each others stereotypes all the time. The Welsh shag sheep, the Scots are always drunk on the cheapest booze, the Irish are always drunk and blow shit up, and the English are all stuck up wankers and football hooligans. None of it is taken seriously, no one is clutching their pearls. And we all get on just fine. If you look to North America, Americans all think they are number 1 at everything while the Canadians are overly polite and pushovers.
The real issue, IMO, is the modern day internet user is too fucking stupid to understand that stereotypes are just that. But then you have all the people claiming that being a boomer makes you a cunt. Or that being right wing makes you a bad guy, and left wing a good guy. That being pro womens rights, means you are anti trans rights. Or that being pro trans means you hate kids or any of the other million or so other things you all get so worked up about every single fucking day in the search for worthless internet points. Seemingly none of you have any idea about the complexity of the human being. That one idea or trait or position, doesnt make you all things associated with that one thing. Im Scottish, I dont drink at all. Im Glaswegian, but my accent isnt so strong that you need subtitles to understand me. I dont have red hair either. I am none of the popular stereotypes said about the group I am in. But I can see the joke, if something makes it. Can you? Or do you just clutch your pearls, and assume that someone is saying something evil against you?
As for Seamus, Harry Potter was written between 1990 and 1992… Unfuckingclench.
- Comment on Had to look this up 2 weeks ago:
When I say “You people” I mean spoon eating cunts, that cant think for themselves and just roam around the internet bashing their fucking skulls into the keyboard hoping to get upvotes, because their self worth is so fucking low that its the only way they can feel good about themselves.
As double downs go… yikes.
- Comment on Had to look this up 2 weeks ago:
This is one of those examples of people reading something on reddit/twitter/facebook, and spreading it around like a fucking moron. That “set”, is a real place. Its the Australia House in London. That is its actual floor.
The movie:
The real place:
It has fuck all to do with Jewish people, or the Star of David. That Geometric shape can be found all over the world. Islamic art, Christian churches, Hindu mandalas, Medieval alchemy, Occult diagrams, Western architectural ornament, Victorian floor tiles, mosaics, stained glass. The list is endless.
Now, lets see you double down. Cos we all know you people cant ever admit you are wrong about something. This will be fun…
- Comment on Had to look this up 2 weeks ago:
No one seems to have had any issue with the stereotyping didnt seem to appear until the internet decided she was a cunt. The reality is that the character is one of the better ones in the book. Yes, hes stereotyped and the blowing up gags are a lot. But the character is never shat on. Never made to be the butt of the joke. Hes shown to be brave, funny, loyal. He grows up over the course of the books, and his character goes through some shit.
The main issue seems to be that Americans dont understand, that people over here arent so thin skinned. We can take jokes about stereotypes on the chin. Pretty much everyone in the book is stereotyped in some way. But none of it ever comes across as mean spirited.
Its all just “JK bad” shit. Instead of focusing on her, the things she says and does. People want to make out like everything she ever did was shit. Its silly.
- Comment on Is it gay to have pleasurable sex with your wife? 2 weeks ago:
Ironically, that kinda is what he said. The meme is misrepresenting what he actually said, for some reason. Without getting too deep into it, he basically said that sex that wasnt for the express purpose of making babies, was “gay sex”. The mention of orgasms, was in relation to this. Not about his wife, or about not giving your wife orgasms. Just that having sex only to have orgasms was “gay sex”.
So, yes, he basically said that anyone having sex that wasnt about making babies, was gay…
- Comment on What ever you do, don't think of the number 37. 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on "Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics. 2 weeks ago:
What I just spelled out to you…
- Comment on [META] What actually constitutes "mildly infuriating" content? 2 weeks ago:
I dont think Ive ever seen a post on mildlyinfurating that wasnt scorched earth, everyone dies, fucking mega mental infuriating. Its right up there with aita and all its “So I reported the guy who raped me to the police. Some friends are saying I did the right thing, but some family are saying I should have just worked it out. Am I the asshole?” posts.
- Comment on "Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics. 2 weeks ago:
DNA is basically your identity. Your health, your ancestry, everything. But its also, not just you. Its your family, past and future. If we start talking the DNA of the dead, and Im pretty sure we already do as the dead have no rights, then at some point someone is going to challenge the right to privacy of the living in this area. After all, we’re all going to die sooner or later, so why not get that sweet, sweet data just now?
Basic harms would be health insurance. If a provider has your DNA, it might show that your great, great granny got cancer. And they use that data to increase your rates. Or worse, deny your treatment, because your granny had the same treatment, and it didnt work.
What about work? Your ancestor has his history of health issues, and so refuses to hire you because you might get that too.
DNA from you or your relatives can also be use to track you, identify you, connect you to certain locations.
But heres the big one. Cancer. Your DNA holds the key to curing cancer. Some company has your DNA, and using your DNA creates a cure for Cancer. They then make trillions of money off of it. And you get fuck all, even though it your DNA. You dont even get to say that it should be given away. Its theirs now.
Also, once a company has your DNA. They have it forever. That you and your family, easily profiled, tracked, and whatever else until the end of time. What if, at some point, some targets you or a descendant with a DNA targeted virus? Science fiction now, but maybe not in the future.
Basically, the damage that can be done is limitless.
- Comment on Reselling tickets for profit to be outlawed in UK government crackdown 2 weeks ago:
Very. You have the 100% option of not buying scalped shit at all times.
- Comment on Reselling tickets for profit to be outlawed in UK government crackdown 2 weeks ago:
But ticketmaster can still fuck everyone over though, right? Right?
- Comment on Is it gay to have pleasurable sex with your wife? 2 weeks ago:
Yeah, the culture wars are just so annoying. So many people talking memes as gospel truth. Its like seeing a picture of Yoda next to the quote “Live long and prosper” and thinking it must be a star wars quote.
- Comment on Is it gay to have pleasurable sex with your wife? 2 weeks ago:
Hes making a blanket statement about sex for reasons other than making babies. He says having sex just to have an orgasm, is gay sex. Not that he does, or if you make your lady cum, its gay.
Hes saying that you, me, everyone, who has sex ONLY to have an orgasm, is having gay sex. See the difference?
- Comment on Is it gay to have pleasurable sex with your wife? 2 weeks ago:
No, he thinks that having sex for any other reason than making babies is gay sex. Not specifically giving his wife an orgasm.
- Comment on Is it gay to have pleasurable sex with your wife? 2 weeks ago:
So, it turns out he didnt say that. Well, not exactly. He did say that “gay sex” was anything that wasnt about “making babies”, but he wasnt saying dont give your wife an orgasm. He was talking about having sex just to get an orgasm being materialistic.
Still a massive fucking idiot, but he did not say whats said here.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH6uydPCX8Q<<< What he actually said… A YEAR AGO!
The greater point seems to be about being against women being on birth control. I dont know, as I couldnt stand listening to him talk for very long.
- Comment on Is it gay to have pleasurable sex with your wife? 2 weeks ago:
It aint limited to girls, bro beans. Anyone who isnt a fucking idiot hates their guts.
- Comment on Pure contentment 2 weeks ago:
Ill take “Things I tell myself to avoid the truth that Im really just a prick” for 100, Alex…
