RaptorBenn

@RaptorBenn@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  Oh no! My feelings!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Tldr

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Likely to get him to stay in the position because the board or whatever thinks he is worth that much to keep on. I’m not saying they got their moneys worth but they obviously thought so. They arent handing him a bonus as big as that as a pat on the back.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  I didn’t read past the abject lie that is “A lot of Batistas work full the jobs actually”.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Sorry, I just assumed because you seemed to be at about that level.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Okay, you go do whatever you can to that face and come back and tell me what changed. The answer will be nothing.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  By shit work i mean unskilled labour basically. It’s not worth much for a reason. I dont see why you would ask me that.

  Some business operate on unskilled labour, it shouldnt be a surprise that its not paid well, just because something doesnt pay well doesnt mean the company shouldnt exist, and since when did anyone expect that a part time job at startbucks could or should be able to fully support a person? That’s fucking ludicrous. And before you start with people have to take what they can get, yes thats true and starbucks isnt responsible for that shortfall, in a real socialist democracy, that should be taken up by welfare if needed.

  I understand the gut reaction to go after the CEO or board for making decisions that affect so many people, but it doesnt help, its misdirected energy that should go to the government.

  We cant expect any company to do what in the interest of the workers, unless its financially beneficial. The best way to handle this is to use government to reign in corps to limits we can be happy with.

  I stand by all I’ve said, but I respect your position, i just think it’s misguided.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  There’s a fucking recession coming you dolt, ofcourse large companies are going to dump people, and it doesnt take a psychopath to do it.

  Your hearts in the right place, but if you cant be realistic about the why and how of running a business, i dont want your opinions.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Oh so that’s their reason is it, make number look good, company be strong.

  It wouldnt be because of your idiot president causing a recession where more people wont be able to afford to buy coffee as often? You dont think that could be a contributing factor?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  I don’t believe that, you’ve just attached that to my argument because you either can’t understand my point or don’t want to.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Why would I do that.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Lol, okay, blame starbucks all you want, it’s a faceless entity. You could be mad at the politicians who set you up to instantly fall into desperation the moment you lose a minimum wage job, but if you want to be mad and ineffectual at the same time, be my guest.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks continues to be terrible⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  I don’t know why people think large companies aren’t allowed to get rid of people when they want to? And especially Starbucks, it’s shit-work, not a 20y long career maker.